Assertion

Partials at long lengths can be an alternative to full range of motion exercises for muscle growth.

13 / 100

0 / 100

Explained

The study found that partials at long lengths were similar to full range of motion exercises for muscle growth, suggesting that they can be an alternative. This assertion is based on the comparison of partials at long lengths to full range of motion exercises for muscle growth.

Context for Assertion

The context of this assertion is the comparison of partials at long lengths to full range of motion exercises for muscle growth.

Concepts for Assertion

Evidence for Assertion

Why relevant:

Why true:The study found that partials at long lengths were similar to full range of motion exercises for muscle growth in trained individuals through a randomized controlled trial.

How it is true:The study conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of partials at long lengths to full range of motion exercises on muscle growth in trained individuals.

ELI5

The study tested the claim by comparing the effects of partials at long lengths to full range of motion exercises on muscle growth in trained individuals.
They found that partials at long lengths were similar to full range of motion exercises for muscle growth in trained individuals.
This means that the claim that partials at long lengths can be an alternative to full range of motion exercises for muscle growth is supported by the study.

13 / 100

Lengthened Partial Repetitions Elicit Similar Muscular Adaptations as a Full Range of Motion During Resistance Training in Trained Individuals

Study Type:Human Study

DOI:N/a

Experimental Study

Human

Unknown

Publication 01/01/1970

Assertion from content

It’s Finally Here! This NEW Study on Muscle Growth is Epic

“It was ultimately found growth at all regions was similar between both types of training thus partials at long lengths weren't any better than a full range of motion but it wasn't any worse.”