Assertion
Partials at long lengths may be an effective alternative to a full range of motion for muscle growth.
13 / 100
0 / 100
Explained
This assertion is based on the idea that the peak squeeze achieved by a full range of motion may not deliver additional gains, and partials at long lengths might be an alternative. The explanation for this is that the study found that growth at all regions was similar between both types of training.
Context for Assertion
The context of this assertion is the discussion of different training methods for muscle growth.
Concepts for Assertion
Tags
muscle growth
training methods
Evidence for Assertion
Why relevant:
Why true:The study found that growth at all regions was similar between both types of training.
How it is true:The study conducted an experiment to test the effects of partials at long lengths and a full range of motion on muscle growth.
ELI5
- The study tested the claim by comparing the effects of partials at long lengths and a full range of motion on muscle growth.
- They found that growth at all regions was similar between both types of training.
- This means that the claim that partials at long lengths may be an effective alternative is supported by the study.
13 / 100
Study Type:Human Study
DOI:N/a
Experimental Study
Human
Unknown
Publication 01/01/1970