Assertion
The total number of weekly sets is a critical factor in determining the effectiveness of a training program.
Explained
The assertion is made in the context of discussing the importance of considering the total number of weekly sets when evaluating training frequency. The text explains that the total number of weekly sets is a critical factor in determining the effectiveness of a training program, and that training frequency is not the only factor to consider. The assertion is relevant because it highlights the importance of considering the total number of weekly sets when evaluating training frequency.
Context for Assertion
The context of this assertion is the discussion of training frequency and its impact on muscle hypertrophy. The text provides an overview of different training splits, such as bro splits, lower splits, and full body, and explains how the total number of weekly sets is a critical factor in determining the effectiveness of a training program.
Concepts for Assertion
Tags
Evidence for Assertion
Why relevant:
Why true:The study found that highly trained individuals can recover from 4 hard sets per muscle group in 24 hours, which supports the assertion that the total number of weekly sets is a critical factor in determining the effectiveness of a training program.
How it is true:The study conducted an experiment to examine the recovery time of highly trained individuals after performing 4 hard sets per muscle group, and found that they can recover in 24 hours.
ELI5
- The study examined the recovery time of highly trained individuals after performing 4 hard sets per muscle group.
- The study found that highly trained individuals can recover from 4 hard sets per muscle group in 24 hours, which means that the total number of weekly sets is a critical factor in determining the effectiveness of a training program.
- This finding is important because it highlights the importance of considering the total number of weekly sets when evaluating training frequency.
DOI:N/a
Why relevant:
Why true:
How it is true:
ELI5
- The study looked at many previous studies to see how training frequency affected muscle growth.
- They found that changing how often people train a muscle (e.g., 2 times vs. 3 times a week) didn't really change how much muscle they built if the total number of sets was the same.
- This suggests that the total number of sets is more important than how often you train, meaning the original claim about training frequency being critical is not supported.