View

The Study

Semaglutide vs. liraglutide and incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease: A target trial emulation using real-world data.

In simple terms

This study looked at people who were already taking one of two weight-loss drugs and saw who got diabetes later. It found that people on semaglutide were less likely to get diabetes than those on liraglutide, but we don’t know if the drug itself caused that — maybe the people who got semaglutide were just healthier to begin with.

67%

Analysis score

67/ 72

Maximum 72 for a cohort study.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology56
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Cohort Study
Level 2b - Individual cohort study
What’s the bottom line?

Two similar weight-loss drugs, semaglutide and liraglutide, were compared in real-world use to see which one better prevents type 2 diabetes.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cohort Studies
Level 2b
67

67 / 100

Quality score

Groups of people are followed over time to see who develops an outcome. Strong for identifying risk factors and associations, but cannot prove causation as firmly as RCTs.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1The diabetes benefit of semaglutide takes time to show up — it’s not immediate, but once it kicks in, it’s stronger than liraglutide’s.
  2. 2This matters because many people stop taking these drugs within a year.
  3. 3After 6 months, semaglutide users had 20% fewer new diabetes cases than liraglutide users; before 6 months, both were equally effective.
  4. 4Neither drug showed a clear difference in preventing heart attacks or strokes.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

British journal of clinical pharmacology

Year

2026

Authors

Ethan J. Cannon, Wendy Wang, F. Norby, Rob F. Walker, Shalini Kulasingam, L. Chow, Joel F. Farley, P. Lutsey

Open Access
Analysis v6
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.