View

The Study

Resistance Training Beyond Momentary Failure: The Effects of Past‐Failure Partials Versus Initial Partials on Calf Muscle Hypertrophy Among a Resistance‐Trained Cohort

In simple terms

This study tried two different ways of doing calf raises and saw which one made the calf muscle a little bigger. It found a tiny difference, but it’s so small and uncertain that we can’t be sure one way is truly better than the other—it might just be luck.

60%

Analysis score

60/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology59
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Two ways to do calf raises were tested: starting with a partial motion or doing full motion then pushing past failure with partials. Both made calves bigger, but one was a tiny bit better.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
60

60 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Both methods work well for growing calves; the tiny edge of initial partials isn't strong enough to say it's better in real life.
  2. 2Initial partials: 9.5% thicker calf; past-failure partials: 6.7% thicker calf.
  3. 3Difference: 0.40 mm — too small to be sure it's real.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

European Journal of Sport Science

Year

2025

Authors

Stian Larsen, N. Ø. Sandberg, B. Schoenfeld, A. B. Fredriksen, B. S. Kristiansen, Milo Wolf, Roland van den Tillaar, P. Swinton, H. Falch

Open Access
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.