View

The Study

Prospective comparison of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, whole-body MRI and CT in primary nodal staging of unfavourable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer

In simple terms

This study found that a new kind of scan (18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT) is better at spotting tiny cancer spots in the pelvis than older scans like MRI and CT — but it didn’t prove that using this scan helps patients live longer or feel better. It just shows the scan finds more cancer spots.

44%

Analysis score

44/ 44

Maximum 44 for a cross-sectional study.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology19
Publication100
Statistical100
Study type (basis of the score)
Cross-Sectional Study
Level 4 - Case series
What’s the bottom line?

Doctors use scans to see if prostate cancer has spread to nearby lymph nodes. This new scan (PSMA PET/CT) finds more cancer than older scans like MRI and CT.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cross-Sectional & Case Series
Level 4
44

44 / 100

Quality score

Snapshots of a population at a single point in time, or descriptions of small groups. Can identify correlations and prevalence, but cannot determine cause and effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — missing cancer means patients might get the wrong treatment.
  2. 2This scan finds more hidden cancer, helping doctors choose better treatments.
  3. 3PSMA PET/CT found cancer in 87% of cases, MRI found it in 45%, and CT found it in 26%.
  4. 4PSMA found cancer in 26% of cases where MRI and CT missed it.
  5. 5It saw cancer in tiny nodes under 8mm that others couldn't.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Year

2021

Authors

S. Malaspina, M. Anttinen, P. Taimen, I. Jambor, M. Sandell, I. Rinta-Kiikka, S. Kajander, J. Schildt, E. Saukko, T. Noponen, J. Saunavaara, P. Dean, R. Sequeiros, H. Aronen, J. Kemppainen, M. Seppänen, P. Boström, O. Ettala

Open Access
43 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (6)

Assertion

A special kind of scan called 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT can find small cancer spots in the pelvis that regular CT or MRI scans miss—especially those smaller than 8 mm—because it sees things differently than just looking at shape and size.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

For about 1 in 4 men with cancer spread to the pelvic lymph nodes, a special PET scan called 18F-PSMA-1007 found the cancer when regular MRI and CT scans didn’t see anything — meaning this new scan might catch things others miss.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

A special kind of scan called 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT is really good at telling apart cancerous lymph nodes in the pelvis from harmless ones in men with high-risk prostate cancer — it hardly ever makes a mistake and is just as accurate as MRI or CT scans.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

A new kind of scan called 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT is much better at finding tiny cancer spread in the pelvis than older scans like MRI or CT — it catches cancer in nearly 9 out of 10 men where other scans miss it, and it can see really small tumors that regular scans can’t even spot.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

Sometimes, a full-body MRI scan might miss a serious problem, making doctors think everything’s fine when it’s not — and that delay could lead to really bad health results.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

A special type of scan called 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT helps doctors agree more often on whether cancer has spread to the pelvic lymph nodes than other scans like MRI or CT — it’s like everyone using this scan sees the same thing, while others keep disagreeing.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.