View

The Study

Influence of protein source (cricket, pea, whey) on amino acid bioavailability and activation of the mTORC1 signaling pathway after resistance exercise in healthy young males

In simple terms

This study shows that when young men drink different kinds of protein after exercise, the amount of building blocks (amino acids) in their blood is higher with whey than with cricket or pea protein. But we can't say for sure that the protein type *caused* the difference because we don’t know all the details about how the study was done.

47%

Analysis score

47/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology62
Publication100
Statistical23
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Young men exercised one leg and then drank a protein shake made from cricket, pea, or whey. Scientists checked their blood and muscles to see how each protein worked.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
47

47 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Even though whey raised amino acids more, none of the proteins worked better than the others at turning on muscle growth signals in the short term.
  2. 2Whey protein caused higher levels of amino acids in the blood than cricket or pea.
  3. 3All three proteins turned on the muscle growth signal (mTORC1) the same amount.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

European Journal of Nutrition

Year

2022

Authors

Sofie Kaas Lanng, Mikkel Oxfeldt, Simon S. Pedersen, F. Johansen, Jeyanthini Risikesan, Trine Lejel, H. C. Bertram, M. Hansen

23 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.