View

The Study

Healthful and unhealthful plant-based diets and site-specific cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

In simple terms

This study looked at lots of people over many years and found that those who ate more healthy plants like fruits, veggies, and whole grains tended to get less cancer—but that doesn’t mean eating those foods caused the lower cancer risk. Other things, like exercise or not smoking, might also be helping.

53%

Analysis score

53/ 85

Maximum 85 for a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology0
Publication100
Statistical100
Study type (basis of the score)
Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Level 2a - Systematic review of cohort studies
What’s the bottom line?

Eating lots of fruits, veggies, whole grains, and nuts may help lower cancer risk, but eating lots of sugary snacks and white bread—even if they’re plant-based—might make it worse.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Reviews of Cohort Studies
Level 2a
53

53 / 100

Quality score

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of cohort studies. They sit above a single cohort study but below a single randomized trial, because the underlying evidence is still observational.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes—these changes are meaningful at a population level, equivalent to reducing cancer risk by eating more whole foods and avoiding processed snacks.
  2. 2Healthful plant foods: 6% less breast cancer, 5% less colorectal cancer, 23% less liver cancer per 10-point diet score increase.
  3. 3Unhealthful plant foods: 3% more breast cancer per 10-point score increase.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

European Journal of Nutrition

Year

2026

Authors

Mercedes Gil-Lespinard, Lucía Iglesias-Vázquez, Paula Jakszyn

Open Access
1 citations
Analysis v6

Related Content

Claims (7)

Assertion

People who eat more high-quality plant foods, such as fruits, vegetables, whole grains, nuts, and legumes, have a 5% lower risk of colorectal cancer for every 10-point increase in a healthful plant-based diet score. Similar results are seen with broader plant-based diet measures.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

People who eat more whole grains, fruits, vegetables, legumes, and nuts have a 6% lower risk of breast cancer for every 10-point increase in a diet quality score based on these foods.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

People who eat more unhealthy plant-based foods, such as refined grains and sugary drinks, do not show a statistically significant increase in colorectal cancer risk, although there is a slight upward trend, and this effect is weaker than what is observed for breast cancer.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

People who eat more refined grains, sugary drinks, sweets, and ultra-processed plant foods have a 3% higher risk of breast cancer for every 10-point increase in a diet score measuring these foods, regardless of how much animal food they consume.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

People who follow healthful plant-based diets have a 23% lower risk of liver cancer for every 10-point increase in their diet quality score, and those who follow plant-based diets overall have a 17% lower risk of liver cancer. These patterns are linked to lower levels of insulin resistance and inflammation.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

People who follow plant-based diets more closely have a 24% lower risk of developing lung cancer compared to those with the lowest adherence, regardless of smoking history.

Correlational
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.