View

The Study

One, two, or three times a week? examining the optimal frequency for strength and muscle growth in accentuated eccentric exercise

In simple terms

This study watched a small group of strong athletes train different amounts and saw what happened to their muscles. It didn't randomly assign who trained how much, so we can't say one way definitely caused better results — just that all ways helped a bit.

45%

Analysis score

45/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology34
Publication100
Statistical54
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Three groups of strong athletes did the same total amount of heavy squatting each week — some did it once, some twice, some three times — to see if doing it more often made them stronger or bigger.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
45

45 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1The tiny difference between 1x and 3x per week means training more often doesn’t meaningfully improve strength or muscle growth if you do the same total work.
  2. 2Everyone got stronger: eccentric strength up 14%, concentric up 9.3%, quadriceps muscle 3.6% bigger.
  3. 3Those who trained 3x/week were only 3.2% stronger in concentric lifts than those who trained 1x/week.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

European Journal of Applied Physiology

Year

2025

Authors

P. Refsnes, Jon Ingulf Medbø, Vidar E Jakobsen, Arne Vilberg, Harald Vikne

3 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (7)

Assertion

When the total amount of exercise is kept the same, increasing workouts from once to twice per week does not result in a meaningful difference in muscle growth.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

When the total amount of weight training per week is the same, changing how often you train—such as once a week versus five times a week—does not change the amount of muscle growth.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

Resistance-trained athletes who performed 12 weeks of squat training with extra emphasis on the lowering phase showed a 28.6% increase in strength endurance, a 7.3% increase in squat jump power, and a 4.4% increase in countermovement jump power.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

Resistance-trained athletes who performed 12 weeks of squat training emphasizing the lowering phase showed a 14.0% gain in eccentric strength and a 9.3% gain in concentric strength.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

Resistance-trained athletes who perform accentuated eccentric loading squats one, two, or three times per week for 12 weeks experience measurable increases in multiple strength and power metrics and muscle size, with only a minor additional benefit in concentric strength when training three times per week instead of once.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

For athletes who regularly lift weights, performing accentuated eccentric squats once, twice, or three times per week with the same total weekly workload leads to nearly identical gains in strength, power, and muscle size, with only a minor and practically unimportant difference in concentric strength favoring three sessions per week.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.