Study analysis · Atherosclerosis · 2017
Eating tomatoes can lower your bad cholesterol by 0.22 mmol/L—but lycopene alone might not be the magic bullet.
A review of 21 studies found that eating tomatoes can improve cholesterol, inflammation, and blood vessel function, while lycopene supplements lower blood pressure.
Overview
What the study found
The study in plain English — the bottom line, every takeaway we extracted, and what to do with them.
In simple terms
This study looked at many smaller studies where people ate tomatoes or took lycopene pills to see if it helped their heart health. Because the studies might not have been the strongest type (like a blind test with a placebo), we can't say for sure that tomatoes cause these improvements – they might be linked, but we need more proof.
What’s the bottom line?
Researchers looked at 21 studies to see if eating tomatoes or taking lycopene helps heart health. They found that tomatoes can lower bad cholesterol and inflammation, and improve blood vessel function. Lycopene can lower blood pressure.
How strong is this study?
The researchers did a good job by gathering lots of studies and combining their results, which gives us a bigger picture. But we only have a short summary of their work, and we don't know if the individual studies were done well or if some were biased. So we need to be careful about trusting the results completely.
0 / 100
- COI disclosureconflicts of interest not disclosed
- Data availabilitydata not shared
- Code availabilitycode not shared
0 / 100
- Randomizationrandomization unclear
- Blindingblinding unclear
- Control groupno control group
- Sample sizeno sample size reported
- Follow-upno follow-up reported
100 / 100
54 / 100
- P-values+15/15
- Effect size+20/20
- Confidence intervalsno confidence intervals
- Pre-registrationnot pre-registered
Each component is scored out of 100 and then capped by the study design — a case series cannot reach the ceiling a randomised trial can, however well it is reported.
Where it sits
RCT reviewsReviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)
Max 100Randomized TrialsRandomized Trials
Max 90Reviews of Cohort StudiesReviews of Cohort Studies
Max 85Cohort StudiesCohort Studies
Max 72Reviews of Case-Control StudiesReviews of Case-Control Studies
Max 63Case-Control StudiesCase-Control Studies
Max 58Cross-Sectional & Case SeriesCross-Sectional & Case Series
Max 50Expert OpinionExpert Opinion
Max 533 / 100
Probability of being correct
The highest quality evidence. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses that pool randomized controlled trials, giving the most reliable summary of experimental evidence.
This design cannot establish causation — the findings describe an association, not a cause. The systematic review included intervention trials but it does not specify whether they were randomized controlled trials. Without clear evidence of randomization, causal inference is limited. Additionally, meta-analysis combines heterogeneous studies, and the abstract does not provide details on study quality or risk of bias.
COI Unknown
Could not determine conflict of interest status
No conflicts of interest or funding information disclosed in the study text.
The study text does not include any declaration of conflicts of interest, funding sources, or author affiliations. Without this information, it is impossible to determine potential biases.
Key takeaways
- 01
Bad cholesterol down 0.22 mmol/L, inflammation down a bit (standardized mean difference -0.25), blood vessel function up 2.53%, systolic blood pressure down 5.66 mmHg.
- 02
These changes are modest but could help heart health over time.
Surprising findings
- Lycopene supplements alone did not significantly affect cholesterol, inflammation, or blood vessel function—only whole tomato products did for those markers.Common belief holds that lycopene is the key heart-healthy component of tomatoes. This study suggests that other compounds (e.g., other carotenoids, vitamins, fiber) may be responsible for additional benefits.
- Tomato supplementation improved FMD by 2.53%, a marker of endothelial function, but did not significantly affect pulse wave velocity (arterial stiffness).Many expect all vascular measures to improve uniformly. This differential effect suggests tomatoes may primarily improve the inner lining function rather than arterial stiffness.
Practical takeaways
Incorporate cooked tomatoes (like tomato sauce, paste, or canned tomatoes) into meals regularly to maximize lycopene absorption and overall heart benefits.
Effects are modest and based on short-term trials; full diet and lifestyle matter more. Full paper not available to verify methodology quality.
low confidenceIf you take lycopene supplements, focus on blood pressure benefits (≈5 mmHg reduction) but don't expect significant changes in cholesterol or inflammation.
Lycopene supplements only showed benefit for systolic BP; not all supplements are equal in bioavailability. Full paper not available.
low confidenceWhy this study matters
Whole Tomatoes vs. Lycopene: The Synergy Effect
The meta-analysis found that tomato products (not just lycopene) significantly reduced LDL-cholesterol by 0.22 mmol/L and IL-6 (inflammation marker) by a standardized mean difference of -0.25, and improved flow-mediated dilation (FMD) by 2.53%. In contrast, lycopene supplementation only significantly reduced systolic blood pressure by 5.66 mmHg, with no effects on lipids or inflammation. This suggests other compounds in tomatoes may be responsible for the broader benefits.
Many people assume lycopene is the sole active ingredient in tomatoes for heart health. This study shows that whole tomatoes or tomato products may offer more comprehensive benefits than isolated lycopene supplements.
Small Changes, Big Impact?
The reductions observed—0.22 mmol/L in LDL, 2.53% in FMD, and 5.66 mmHg in systolic BP—are modest but clinically meaningful. For context, a 1 mmHg reduction in systolic BP can lower cardiovascular risk by 2-3% at a population level.
Audiences often want quick, dramatic results. Emphasizing that small, consistent dietary changes can accumulate over time makes this actionable and realistic.
Tomatoes and Inflammation: Not Just Cholesterol
Beyond lowering LDL, tomato products reduced IL-6, a key inflammatory marker linked to heart disease. The standardized mean difference of -0.25 is moderate, but it highlights an anti-inflammatory benefit often overlooked in cholesterol-focused discussions.
Inflammation is a hot topic in health. Showing that a common food can help manage inflammation is both surprising and practical.
Want the whole report?
Detailed mode opens the full scientific breakdown — every score component, the methodology, conflicts of interest, the evidence analysis behind each claim, and the raw study data.
Overview
What the study found
The study in plain English — the bottom line, every takeaway we extracted, and what to do with them.
Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a healthcare professional. Terms
Researchers looked at 21 studies to see if eating tomatoes or taking lycopene helps heart health. They found that tomatoes can lower bad cholesterol and inflammation, and improve blood vessel function. Lycopene can lower blood pressure.
Research results
Bad cholesterol down 0.22 mmol/L, inflammation down a bit (standardized mean difference -0.25), blood vessel function up 2.53%, systolic blood pressure down 5.66 mmHg.
What this means - more context
These changes are modest but could help heart health over time.
To evaluate the state of the evidence from intervention trials on the effect of consuming tomato products and lycopene on markers of cardiovascular function.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 intervention trials found that tomato supplementation significantly reduced LDL-cholesterol and interleukin-6, and improved flow-mediated dilation, while lycopene supplementation significantly reduced systolic blood pressure.
Methods Used
Systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention trials. Three databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus) searched from inception to August 2016. Inclusion criteria: intervention trials reporting effects of tomato products or lycopene on cardiovascular risk factors in adults >18 years. Random-effects models used for pooled effect sizes.
Main Finding
Tomato product supplementation was associated with significant reductions in LDL-cholesterol (-0.22 mmol/L), IL-6 (SMD -0.25), and improvement in FMD (2.53%). Lycopene supplementation significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (-5.66 mmHg). No significant effects on other outcomes.
Confidence Level
Limited - based on abstract only, full methodology not available
Study Flags
Red Flags
- •Full text not available - methodology details cannot be verified
- •Only 21 trials included, may vary in quality
- •Abstract does not specify blinding or randomization of included trials
No biological mechanisms were identified in this study. This may be an epidemiological, observational, or survey-based study that reports associations rather than proposing causal biological pathways.
Surprising Findings
Lycopene supplements alone did not significantly affect cholesterol, inflammation, or blood vessel function—only whole tomato products did for those markers.
Common belief holds that lycopene is the key heart-healthy component of tomatoes. This study suggests that other compounds (e.g., other carotenoids, vitamins, fiber) may be responsible for additional benefits.
Practical Takeaways
Incorporate cooked tomatoes (like tomato sauce, paste, or canned tomatoes) into meals regularly to maximize lycopene absorption and overall heart benefits.
RCT reviewsReviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)
Max 100Randomized TrialsRandomized Trials
Max 90Reviews of Cohort StudiesReviews of Cohort Studies
Max 85Cohort StudiesCohort Studies
Max 72Reviews of Case-Control StudiesReviews of Case-Control Studies
Max 63Case-Control StudiesCase-Control Studies
Max 58Cross-Sectional & Case SeriesCross-Sectional & Case Series
Max 50Expert OpinionExpert Opinion
Max 533 / 100
Probability of being correct
The highest quality evidence. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses that pool randomized controlled trials, giving the most reliable summary of experimental evidence.
Human Meta-Analysis
Subject
Lower probability
on the GRADE evidence scale
This study looked at many smaller studies where people ate tomatoes or took lycopene pills to see if it helped their heart health. Because the studies might not have been the strongest type (like a blind test with a placebo), we can't say for sure that tomatoes cause these improvements – they might be linked, but we need more proof.
Strengths
- Systematic review with meta-analysis
- Multiple databases searched
- Use of random-effects models
Weaknesses
- Full methodology not available - based on abstract only
- Uncertainty about the design of included studies (not explicitly stated as RCTs)
- Potential publication bias not assessed in abstract
Methodology
Evidence Keywords
Statistical Reporting
Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a healthcare professional. Terms
Researchers looked at 21 studies to see if eating tomatoes or taking lycopene helps heart health. They found that tomatoes can lower bad cholesterol and inflammation, and improve blood vessel function. Lycopene can lower blood pressure.
Research results
Bad cholesterol down 0.22 mmol/L, inflammation down a bit (standardized mean difference -0.25), blood vessel function up 2.53%, systolic blood pressure down 5.66 mmHg.
What this means - more context
These changes are modest but could help heart health over time.
To evaluate the state of the evidence from intervention trials on the effect of consuming tomato products and lycopene on markers of cardiovascular function.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 intervention trials found that tomato supplementation significantly reduced LDL-cholesterol and interleukin-6, and improved flow-mediated dilation, while lycopene supplementation significantly reduced systolic blood pressure.
Methods Used
Systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention trials. Three databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus) searched from inception to August 2016. Inclusion criteria: intervention trials reporting effects of tomato products or lycopene on cardiovascular risk factors in adults >18 years. Random-effects models used for pooled effect sizes.
Main Finding
Tomato product supplementation was associated with significant reductions in LDL-cholesterol (-0.22 mmol/L), IL-6 (SMD -0.25), and improvement in FMD (2.53%). Lycopene supplementation significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (-5.66 mmHg). No significant effects on other outcomes.
Confidence Level
Limited - based on abstract only, full methodology not available
Study Flags
Red Flags
- •Full text not available - methodology details cannot be verified
- •Only 21 trials included, may vary in quality
- •Abstract does not specify blinding or randomization of included trials
No biological mechanisms were identified in this study. This may be an epidemiological, observational, or survey-based study that reports associations rather than proposing causal biological pathways.
Surprising Findings
Lycopene supplements alone did not significantly affect cholesterol, inflammation, or blood vessel function—only whole tomato products did for those markers.
Common belief holds that lycopene is the key heart-healthy component of tomatoes. This study suggests that other compounds (e.g., other carotenoids, vitamins, fiber) may be responsible for additional benefits.
Practical Takeaways
Incorporate cooked tomatoes (like tomato sauce, paste, or canned tomatoes) into meals regularly to maximize lycopene absorption and overall heart benefits.
RCT reviewsReviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)
Max 100Randomized TrialsRandomized Trials
Max 90Reviews of Cohort StudiesReviews of Cohort Studies
Max 85Cohort StudiesCohort Studies
Max 72Reviews of Case-Control StudiesReviews of Case-Control Studies
Max 63Case-Control StudiesCase-Control Studies
Max 58Cross-Sectional & Case SeriesCross-Sectional & Case Series
Max 50Expert OpinionExpert Opinion
Max 533 / 100
Probability of being correct
The highest quality evidence. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses that pool randomized controlled trials, giving the most reliable summary of experimental evidence.
Human Meta-Analysis
Subject
Lower probability
on the GRADE evidence scale
This study looked at many smaller studies where people ate tomatoes or took lycopene pills to see if it helped their heart health. Because the studies might not have been the strongest type (like a blind test with a placebo), we can't say for sure that tomatoes cause these improvements – they might be linked, but we need more proof.
Strengths
- Systematic review with meta-analysis
- Multiple databases searched
- Use of random-effects models
Weaknesses
- Full methodology not available - based on abstract only
- Uncertainty about the design of included studies (not explicitly stated as RCTs)
- Potential publication bias not assessed in abstract
Methodology
Evidence Keywords
Statistical Reporting
Scoring
How strong is this study?
The researchers did a good job by gathering lots of studies and combining their results, which gives us a bigger picture. But we only have a short summary of their work, and we don't know if the individual studies were done well or if some were biased. So we need to be careful about trusting the results completely.
0 / 100
- COI disclosureconflicts of interest not disclosed
- Data availabilitydata not shared
- Code availabilitycode not shared
0 / 100
- Randomizationrandomization unclear
- Blindingblinding unclear
- Control groupno control group
- Sample sizeno sample size reported
- Follow-upno follow-up reported
100 / 100
54 / 100
- P-values+15/15
- Effect size+20/20
- Confidence intervalsno confidence intervals
- Pre-registrationnot pre-registered
Each component is scored out of 100 and then capped by the study design — a case series cannot reach the ceiling a randomised trial can, however well it is reported.
Where it sits
RCT reviewsReviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)
Max 100Randomized TrialsRandomized Trials
Max 90Reviews of Cohort StudiesReviews of Cohort Studies
Max 85Cohort StudiesCohort Studies
Max 72Reviews of Case-Control StudiesReviews of Case-Control Studies
Max 63Case-Control StudiesCase-Control Studies
Max 58Cross-Sectional & Case SeriesCross-Sectional & Case Series
Max 50Expert OpinionExpert Opinion
Max 533 / 100
Probability of being correct
The highest quality evidence. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses that pool randomized controlled trials, giving the most reliable summary of experimental evidence.
This design cannot establish causation — the findings describe an association, not a cause. The systematic review included intervention trials but it does not specify whether they were randomized controlled trials. Without clear evidence of randomization, causal inference is limited. Additionally, meta-analysis combines heterogeneous studies, and the abstract does not provide details on study quality or risk of bias.
COI Unknown
Could not determine conflict of interest status
No conflicts of interest or funding information disclosed in the study text.
The study text does not include any declaration of conflicts of interest, funding sources, or author affiliations. Without this information, it is impossible to determine potential biases.
Standing
Who’s using this study?
The videos and claims on this site that lean on this study, and the researchers who wrote it.
1 video from Physionic cite this study, drawing 2 claims from it.