View

The Study

Long-term administration of low-dose selenium nanoparticles with different sizes aggravated atherosclerotic lesions and exhibited toxicity in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice.

In simple terms

This study watched what happened to a special kind of mouse after giving them tiny selenium particles for a long time. It saw that their blood vessels got worse and their liver and kidneys got hurt, but it didn't compare them to mice that didn't get the particles. So we can't say the particles definitely caused the harm — just that they happened at the same time.

17%

Analysis score

17/ 72

Maximum 72 for a cohort study.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology31
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Cohort Study
Level 2b - Individual cohort study
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists gave mice a daily selenium nanoparticle supplement for 6 months to see if it helped their heart disease, like it did in shorter tests.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cohort Studies
Level 2b
17

17 / 100

Quality score

Groups of people are followed over time to see who develops an outcome. Strong for identifying risk factors and associations, but cannot prove causation as firmly as RCTs.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1This doesn't mean selenium supplements are dangerous for people, but it shows long-term use of this specific nanoparticle form in vulnerable animals can backfire.
  2. 2After 6 months, mice got worse: more plaque in arteries, lower antioxidant defenses, higher fat in blood, and damaged liver/kidneys — especially with 40.4 nm nanoparticles.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Chemico-biological interactions

Year

2021

Authors

Junying Xiao, Hui Cao, Siyu Guo, S. Xiao, Na Li, Min Li, Yuzhou Wu, Hongmei Liu

24 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (6)

Assertion

Chronic selenium toxicity occurs when a person consistently consumes more selenium than the body can process and eliminate through normal selenoprotein turnover.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

In apolipoprotein E-deficient mice fed a high-fat diet, daily selenium nanoparticle supplementation at 50 μg Se/kg for 24 weeks leads to increased blood lipid levels due to altered liver lipid metabolism.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

In apolipoprotein E-deficient mice fed a high-fat diet, daily selenium nanoparticle supplementation at 50 μg Se/kg for 24 weeks is associated with lower activity of key antioxidant enzymes and reduced levels of selenoenzymes involved in antioxidant defense.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

In apolipoprotein E-deficient mice fed a high-fat diet, daily selenium nanoparticle supplementation at 50 μg Se/kg for 24 weeks is linked to higher levels of liver and kidney injury markers and more tissue damage.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

In apolipoprotein E-deficient mice on a high-fat diet, daily selenium nanoparticle supplementation at 50 μg Se/kg for 24 weeks is associated with larger arterial plaques, lower antioxidant enzyme levels, and higher oxidative stress markers.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

In mice genetically predisposed to atherosclerosis and fed a high-fat diet, selenium nanoparticles of 40.4 nanometers caused larger increases in arterial plaque and oxidative stress markers than nanoparticles of 23.1 or 86.8 nanometers when given at the same dose for the same duration.

Correlational
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.