View

The Study

5-Year effects of a novel continuous remote care model with carbohydrate-restricted nutrition therapy including nutritional ketosis in type 2 diabetes: An extension study.

In simple terms

This study watched a group of people who chose to follow a special diet and get coaching over five years and saw that many felt better and needed less medicine. But because they picked themselves to join, we can't say for sure the diet caused the improvement — maybe they were just more motivated to get healthy in other ways too.

63%

Analysis score

63/ 72

Maximum 72 for a cohort study.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology46
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Cohort Study
Level 2b - Individual cohort study
What’s the bottom line?

People with type 2 diabetes followed a low-carb diet and got daily coaching through an app for five years.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cohort Studies
Level 2b
63

63 / 100

Quality score

Groups of people are followed over time to see who develops an outcome. Strong for identifying risk factors and associations, but cannot prove causation as firmly as RCTs.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — these changes mean many people could stop insulin and other meds, lose weight, and reduce heart disease risk without surgery.
  2. 220% stopped all diabetes meds and had normal blood sugar; 32.5% only needed metformin; weight dropped 7.6%; bad fats went down 18.4%, good fats went up 17.4%; inflammation dropped 43.6%.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Diabetes research and clinical practice

Year

2024

Authors

Amy L. McKenzie, Shaminie J. Athinarayanan, Michelle R. Van Tieghem, Brittanie M. Volk, C. Roberts, Rebecca N Adams, Jeff S Volek, S. Phinney, Sarah J Hallberg

Open Access
14 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (6)

Assertion

In a five-year remote care program using a very low carbohydrate diet, 32.5% of adults with type 2 diabetes reached HbA1c levels below 6.5% while using only metformin or no diabetes medication.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

Among adults with type 2 diabetes, a five-year remote care program using very low carbohydrate nutrition therapy resulted in a 7.6% reduction in body weight that was maintained without significant weight regain.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

Among adults with type 2 diabetes who followed a continuous remote care program with very low carbohydrate nutrition for five years, triglyceride levels dropped by 18.4% and HDL cholesterol rose by 17.4%, while LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol did not change.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

Among adults with established type 2 diabetes, a remote care program using a very low carbohydrate diet, nutritional ketosis, and telemedicine coaching was linked to 20% of participants achieving diabetes remission after five years, defined as HbA1c below 6.5% without medication for at least three months.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

Among adults with type 2 diabetes, a five-year remote care program using very low carbohydrate nutrition therapy was linked to a 40% lower medication effect score and reduced use of insulin, sulfonylureas, and SGLT2 inhibitors.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

Adults with type 2 diabetes who followed a continuous remote care program with very low carbohydrate nutrition for five years had a 43.6% reduction in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and a 9.7% reduction in white blood cell count, indicating lower levels of systemic inflammation.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.