View

The Study

Long-term calorie restriction decreases metabolic cost of movement and prevents decrease of physical activity during aging in the rhesus monkeys

In simple terms

This study watched monkeys for over 10 years and noticed that those eating less moved around more and used less energy to move. But it didn’t make the monkeys eat less — it just observed what happened. So we can’t say eating less caused the changes, only that they happened together.

16%

Analysis score

16/ 72

Maximum 72 for a cohort study.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology61
Publication100
Statistical54
Study type (basis of the score)
Cohort Study
Level 2b - Individual cohort study
What’s the bottom line?

Monkeys that ate less for many years burned less energy while sleeping but moved more and moved more efficiently, so their total energy use stayed the same — and they didn’t slow down as they aged.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cohort Studies
Level 2b
16

16 / 100

Quality score

Groups of people are followed over time to see who develops an outcome. Strong for identifying risk factors and associations, but cannot prove causation as firmly as RCTs.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1This suggests that in primates, eating less long-term may help preserve movement and energy efficiency, potentially delaying age-related decline — but it’s not clear if this directly applies to humans.
  2. 2CR monkeys had 11–19% lower resting metabolism, 15–30% lower energy cost per movement, and 2x more high-intensity activity than controls; their activity didn’t drop with age, unlike controls who lost 30–40%.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Experimental gerontology

Year

2013

Authors

Yosuke Yamada, R. Colman, J. Kemnitz, S. Baum, Rozalyn M. Anderson, R. Weindruch, D. Schoeller

Open Access
57 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.