View

The Study

Side Effect Patterns in a Crossover Trial of Statin, Placebo, and No Treatment

In simple terms

This study is like a fair test where people who thought statins made them sick took real statins, fake pills, and no pills at different times — without knowing which was which. It shows that their symptoms were just as bad with fake pills as with real ones, meaning the problem was mostly in their expectations, not the medicine itself.

82%

Analysis score

82/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology81
Publication100
Statistical100
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

People who thought they couldn't take statins because of side effects took real statin pills, fake pills, and no pills for one month at a time — without knowing which was which. They recorded how they felt every day.

Where does this study sit?

Systematic Reviews & Meta-analyses

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Case-Control

Max 58

Cross-Sectional

Max 44

Case Reports & Series

Max 30

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
82

82 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. Considered the gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1This means most symptoms people blame on statins are actually caused by expecting to feel bad — not the drug itself.
  2. 2Symptoms were almost the same with real statins (16.3/100) and fake pills (15.4/100).
  3. 390% of statin-linked symptoms also happened with placebo.
  4. 4Half the people restarted statins after the study.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Year

2021

Authors

J. Howard, F. A. Wood, J. Finegold, A. Nowbar, David Thompson, A. Arnold, C. Rajkumar, S. Connolly, J. Cegla, C. Stride, P. Sever, C. Norton, Simon A Thom, M. Shun-shin, D. Francis

Open Access
145 citations
Analysis v3
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.