View

The Study

Association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and C-reactive protein: findings from study of cardiovascular risks in adolescents (ERICA)

In simple terms

This study looked at what teens ate and checked their blood for a sign of inflammation, but it didn't watch them over time. So we can't say if eating more junk food made them inflamed, or if kids who were already a little inflamed just ate more junk food. It only shows a tiny hint that they might be connected.

44%

Analysis score

44/ 44

Maximum 44 for a cross-sectional study.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology25
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Cross-Sectional Study
Level 4 - Case series
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists checked if teens who ate a lot of packaged foods like chips, sodas, and instant noodles had more inflammation in their blood.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cross-Sectional & Case Series
Level 4
44

44 / 100

Quality score

Snapshots of a population at a single point in time, or descriptions of small groups. Can identify correlations and prevalence, but cannot determine cause and effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Even though the link is small and only seen with total UPF intake, over 1 in 7 teens had signs of inflammation — which could matter for long-term health.
  2. 2Teens who ate more than 44.9% of their calories from packaged foods had a tiny bit more inflammation (3.9% higher chance), but eating specific items like soda or candy didn't link to inflammation.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

British Journal of Nutrition

Year

2025

Authors

Gabriela Rocha Dos Santos, Priscila Bárbara Zanini Rosa, N. Martins, Larissa Loures Mendes, A. S. do Carmo, B. Schaan, F. Cureau

Open Access
3 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (6)

Assertion

People who consume large amounts of animal protein and ultra-processed foods have higher levels of systemic inflammation and a higher incidence of autoimmune diseases and cardiovascular disease.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

Adolescents who consume more ultra-processed foods have higher levels of C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation, regardless of their body fat, activity level, smoking, alcohol use, or socioeconomic background.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

In Brazilian adolescents aged 12–17, eating specific ultra-processed foods like sugary drinks, processed meats, sweets, dairy beverages, or carbohydrate-rich ultra-processed foods does not correlate with higher levels of C-reactive protein above 3 mg/L, although overall ultra-processed food intake shows a modest association.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

Among Brazilian teenagers aged 12 to 17, ultra-processed foods make up 31.7% of their daily calories, and no specific type of ultra-processed food has been clearly linked to inflammation levels.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

In Brazil, 13.7% of adolescents aged 12 to 17 have blood levels of C-reactive protein above 3 mg/L, which is a recognized indicator of systemic inflammation.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

Brazilian adolescents aged 12–17 who get at least 44.9% of their daily calories from ultra-processed foods have a 3.9% higher rate of low-grade inflammation, measured by C-reactive protein levels above 3 mg/L, compared to those who consume less, after accounting for age, sex, socioeconomic status, physical activity, and body composition.

Correlational
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.