View

The Study

Can magnetic resonance spectroscopy predict neurodevelopmental outcome in very low birth weight preterm infants?

In simple terms

This study looked at whether brain scans of tiny premature babies could tell if they’d be okay when they grew up. It found that the scans didn’t help predict how they’d do later — but that doesn’t mean the scans are useless. It just means, in this group of babies, the numbers from the scan didn’t match up with how they developed.

32%

Analysis score

32/ 72

Maximum 72 for a cohort study.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology17
Publication100
Statistical23
Study type (basis of the score)
Cohort Study
Level 2b - Individual cohort study
What’s the bottom line?

Doctors scanned the brains of very tiny premature babies near their due date to see if brain chemicals could tell if they’d have trouble learning or moving later.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cohort Studies
Level 2b
32

32 / 100

Quality score

Groups of people are followed over time to see who develops an outcome. Strong for identifying risk factors and associations, but cannot prove causation as firmly as RCTs.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1No, the results don't help doctors predict which babies will have developmental problems — the scan changes with age but can't tell who will struggle later.
  2. 2Brain chemical NAA/Ch went up as babies got older (good sign of brain growth), but it didn't predict if they'd have delays at age 2.
  3. 336 babies total.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Journal of Perinatology

Year

2008

Authors

E M Augustine, D. Spielman, P. Barnes, T L Sutcliffe, J. Dermon, M. Mirmiran, D. B. Clayton, R. Ariagno

Open Access
42 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.