View

The Study

Incubation of Methamphetamine and Palatable Food Craving after Punishment-Induced Abstinence

In simple terms

This study watched rats press levers for food or drugs and saw that after they stopped getting rewards, they kept pressing the lever more after a few weeks — even though nothing happened when they pressed. But this only happened in rats, not people, so we can't say the same thing happens in humans.

21%

Analysis score

21/ 72

Maximum 72 for a cohort study.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology66
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Cohort Study
Level 2b - Individual cohort study
What’s the bottom line?

Rats that learned to press a lever for food or drugs kept wanting it more after two weeks of not getting it—even if they got shocked for pressing before.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cohort Studies
Level 2b
21

21 / 100

Quality score

Groups of people are followed over time to see who develops an outcome. Strong for identifying risk factors and associations, but cannot prove causation as firmly as RCTs.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes—this suggests that even when people quit drugs or junk food because of bad consequences, their cravings can still grow stronger over time, making relapse more likely.
  2. 2After 21 days without food or drugs, rats pressed the lever 2–3 times more than after just 2 days.
  3. 3Food-trained rats kept pressing even when shocked harder than drug-trained rats.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Neuropsychopharmacology

Year

2014

Authors

I. Krasnova, Nathan J. Marchant, B. Ladenheim, M. McCoy, L. Panlilio, J. Bossert, Y. Shaham, J. Cadet

Open Access
118 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (6)

Assertion

Rats that learn to obtain highly preferred food continue pressing a lever despite increasing electric shocks, while rats that learn to obtain methamphetamine stop sooner under the same conditions.

Comparative
Read analysis
Assertion

In rats, prolonged exposure to cues associated with rewards leads to increased craving over time, regardless of whether abstinence was caused by punishment or forced cessation.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

In rats previously trained to self-administer methamphetamine, exposure to drug-related cues causes a measurable increase in reward-seeking behavior between 2 and 21 days after drug access ends, regardless of how drug use was stopped, and this increase grows over time.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

In rats trained to seek palatable food, the intensity of food-seeking behavior triggered by cues increases during withdrawal if measured across different groups of rats, but does not increase if measured in the same rats before and after withdrawal.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

Rats that learned to associate methamphetamine or food with punishment show less interest in cues previously linked to those rewards during extinction tests, compared to rats that did not experience punishment.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

After 14 days without eating highly palatable food, cravings for that food stop because the brain's learned dopamine response to the food no longer activates.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.