View

The Study

Systems genetics identifies a role for Cacna2d1 regulation in elevated intraocular pressure and glaucoma susceptibility

In simple terms

This study found that a specific gene in mice is linked to eye pressure, and a medicine called pregabalin can lower that pressure—but only in mice with a certain version of the gene. It also saw a similar gene pattern in some humans with glaucoma. But it didn’t test the medicine on people, so we can’t say it works for humans yet.

65%

Analysis score

65/ 72

Maximum 72 for a cohort study.

Where the score came from

Reporting35
Methodology55
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Cohort Study
Level 2b - Individual cohort study
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists found that a gene called CACNA2D1 helps control pressure inside the eye, and a drug called pregabalin can lower that pressure — but only if you have the right version of this gene.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cohort Studies
Level 2b
65

65 / 100

Quality score

Groups of people are followed over time to see who develops an outcome. Strong for identifying risk factors and associations, but cannot prove causation as firmly as RCTs.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1This means the drug could work well for some glaucoma patients but not others — depending on their genes — and might lead to personalized eye drop treatments.
  2. 2In mice with one version of the gene, eye pressure dropped by up to 30% after using pregabalin eye drops; in mice with another version, pressure barely changed.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Nature Communications

Year

2017

Authors

Sumana R. Chintalapudi, D. Maria, Xiang Di Wang, J. C. Bailey, Rand Murray Don John Douglas Teresa Jonathan L. Lisa Mi Allingham Brilliant Budenz Fingert Gaasterland Gaa, R. Allingham, Murray H. Brilliant, Don Budenz, J. Fingert, Douglas Gaasterland, Teresa Gaasterland, Jonathan L. Haines, L. Hark, Michael A. Hauser, R. Igo, Jae Hee Kang, P. Kraft, Richard K Lee, P. Lichter, Yutao Liu, Syoko Moroi, L. Pasquale, M. Pericak‐Vance, A. Realini, Doug Rhee, J. R. Richards, R. Ritch, J. Schuman, William K. Scott, Kuldev Singh, A. Sit, Douglas Vollrath, G. Wollstein, Donald J. Zack, Tin Peter Cheng-Yu Jamie Cornelia Puya Adriana Christo Aung Bonnemaijer Cheng Craig van Duijn Gharahkhani, T. Aung, Pieter W. M. Bonnemaijer, Cheng Y. Cheng, J. Craig, C M van Duijn, P. Gharahkhani, A. Iglesias González, Christopher J. Hammond, A. Hewitt, René Hoehn, Fridbert Jonansson, A. Khawaja, Chiea Chuen Khor, C. Klaver, A. Lotery, D. Mackey, Stuart MacGregor, C. Pang, Francesca Pasutto, K. Stefánsson, G. Thorleifsson, U. Thorsteinsdottir, V. Vitart, E. Vithana, Terri L. Young, T. Zeller, P. Hysi, J. Wiggs, Robert W. Williams, M. Jablonski

Open Access
47 citations
Analysis v6
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.