View

The Study

Validation of Food Compass with a healthy diet, cardiometabolic health, and mortality among U.S. adults, 1999–2018

In simple terms

This study looked at what people ate and how healthy they were over time, and found that people who ate foods with higher Food Compass scores tended to be healthier. But it didn’t make people change their diets — it just watched what they already did, so we can’t say eating better foods definitely caused the health improvements.

60%

Analysis score

60/ 72

Maximum 72 for a cohort study.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology38
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Cohort Study
Level 2b - Individual cohort study
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists created a score (Food Compass) that rates how healthy each food is, then added up all the foods a person eats to get their personal health score.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cohort Studies
Level 2b
60

60 / 100

Quality score

Groups of people are followed over time to see who develops an outcome. Strong for identifying risk factors and associations, but cannot prove causation as firmly as RCTs.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1A 10-point score increase is like swapping a sugary snack for an apple — small daily choices add up to big health benefits over time.
  2. 2People with higher scores ate healthier and had: 7% lower risk of dying over 20 years, 15% less metabolic syndrome, 8% less heart disease, better blood pressure, cholesterol, and blood sugar.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Nature Communications

Year

2022

Authors

Meghan O’Hearn, Josh Erndt-Marino, Suzannah Gerber, B. Lauren, C. Economos, J. Wong, J. Blumberg, D. Mozaffarian

Open Access
31 citations
Analysis v6
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.