View

The Study

Striatal dopamine D2/D3 receptor regulation of human reward processing and behaviour

In simple terms

This study gave healthy people a medicine that blocks a brain chemical and saw what happened — it’s like turning off a light switch and seeing if the room gets darker. Because they randomly gave some people the real medicine and others a sugar pill, and nobody knew which was which, we can say the medicine probably caused the changes they saw.

75%

Analysis score

75/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology81
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists gave healthy people two different drugs that affect dopamine — one blocks it strongly, the other barely touches it — and watched how their brains reacted to winning money.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
75

75 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — this shows that long-term use of strong dopamine blockers like some antipsychotics may directly cause emotional numbness and lack of motivation, even in healthy people, while newer drugs like aripiprazole may avoid this side effect.
  2. 2Blocking dopamine with amisulpride made people less responsive to rewards (caudate brain activity dropped 146 units on average) and caused emotional flatness and less speech.
  3. 3Aripiprazole, a partial agonist, caused similar movement side effects but didn’t dull reward feelings or brain responses.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Nature Communications

Year

2025

Authors

M. Osugo, M. B. Wall, P. Selvaggi, Uzma Zahid, Valeria Finelli, George E. Chapman, T. Whitehurst, E. Onwordi, B. Statton, R. McCutcheon, Robin M. Murray, T. R. Marques, M. Mehta, O. Howes

Open Access
15 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (6)

Assertion

Dopamine is a brain chemical that directly enables the experience of motivation, reward, and pleasure when encountering environmental cues.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

In healthy adults, taking 10 mg of aripiprazole daily for seven days does not reduce activity in the brain's reward center or cause negative symptoms, even though it produces motor side effects similar to those caused by drugs that fully block dopamine receptors.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

In healthy adults, taking 400 mg of amisulpride daily for seven days reduces activity in the caudate region of the brain during reward processing and increases the severity of negative symptoms such as blunted affect and reduced speech.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

Higher levels of the drug amisulpride in the blood correspond to a stronger decrease in activity in the caudate region of the brain when processing rewards, demonstrating a direct relationship between drug concentration and reduced neural reward response.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

Blocking or partially activating dopamine D2/D3 receptors in healthy adults causes motor symptoms like restlessness and stiffness, but these symptoms do not relate to changes in brain reward responses, showing that motor and reward systems respond differently to dopamine changes.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

Blocking dopamine D2/D3 receptors for an extended period reduces activity in the caudate nucleus when people receive a reward, but does not reduce activity when they expect a reward.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.