View

The Study

Combined endurance and resistance exercise training in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a randomized controlled trial

In simple terms

This study was a big experiment where patients were randomly put into two groups: one got exercise classes and the other got regular care. Since they were randomly assigned, if we see a difference, we can say the exercise caused it. The experiment found that exercise didn't make a big overall heart failure score better, but it did help people feel better and be able to do more exercise. So we can say exercise can improve fitness and symptoms, but we can't say it fixes the whole heart problem.

90%

Analysis score

90/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting75
Methodology88
Publication100
Statistical100
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Researchers studied 322 people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (a type of heart failure where the heart pumps normally but is stiff). Half did a mix of cardio and strength training for a year, the other half got usual care. The study looked at a combined score of health outcomes. The overall score didn't show a clear benefit from exercise, but exercise did help with exercise ability and heart failure symptoms.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
90

90 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1The improvement in exercise capacity is considered meaningful for patients, potentially improving daily function.
  2. 2The lack of effect on the main composite score means the evidence is mixed, but exercise seems safe and beneficial for some important measures.
  3. 3Exercise training improved the distance/oxygen use by about 1.3 ml/kg/min more than usual care, and people were 7.77 times more likely to have an improved heart failure symptom class.
  4. 4However, the main composite score was not significantly different.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Nature Medicine

Year

2025

Authors

F. Edelmann, R. Wachter, A. Duvinage, S. Mueller, I. Fegers-Wustrow, S. Schwarz, J. Christle, E. Pieske‐Kraigher, Melchior Seyfarth, M. Knapp, Marcus Dörr, Kathleen Nolte, H. Düngen, C. Herrmann-Lingen, Katrin Esefeld, A. Hagendorff, M. Haykowsky, Gerd Hasenfuss, V. Holzendorf, C. Prettin, M. Mende, B. Pieske, Martin Halle

Open Access
33 citations
Analysis v6

Related Content

Claims (10)

Assertion

A year-long program combining endurance and strength training did not significantly improve a composite measure of health outcomes, including death, hospitalization, and everyday functioning, in people with a specific type of heart failure (HFpEF) compared with standard care.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

For people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), a 12-month program of both endurance and resistance exercise improves heart failure symptoms more than usual care, with 7.77 times higher odds of improvement.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

For stable patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, a supervised 12-month exercise program that combines endurance and resistance training is safe, causing no heart attacks or strokes during exercise sessions. However, these patients were hospitalized for heart failure or exercise-related reasons more often than patients receiving usual care.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

A 12-month program of combined endurance and resistance exercise does not significantly delay death from any cause or reduce heart-related hospitalizations in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, compared with standard care.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

For people with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction, a 12-month exercise program that includes both endurance and resistance training improves cardiorespiratory fitness, raising peak oxygen consumption by an average of 1.3 ml/kg/min compared with standard care.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

A year-long program of endurance and resistance exercise does not significantly improve a combined heart failure outcome score in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared to standard care. The score tracks death, hospitalizations, and changes in exercise capacity and heart function.

Causal
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.