View

The Study

Effects of an open-label placebo intervention on reactions to social exclusion in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial

In simple terms

This study showed that when people were left out in a game, those who took a pill they were told was a placebo (but wasn't medicine) felt less hurt than those who didn't get a pill. But it only measured how they felt, not what they did, and only in a small group of college students.

65%

Analysis score

65/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology51
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

People were told they got a sugar pill that can help with feeling hurt — even though they knew it had no medicine. Those who felt left out in a game reported feeling less emotional pain after taking it.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
65

65 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — feeling less hurt after being excluded is meaningful because social pain can lead to anger, depression, or isolation, and this is a simple, non-drug way to ease it.
  2. 2People who were left out and took the fake pill felt 0.77 standard deviations less hurt than those who didn't take it.
  3. 3Their sense of belonging, control, or self-worth didn't improve.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Scientific Reports

Year

2023

Authors

Leonie Stumpp, Melissa Jauch, Dilan Sezer, Jens Gaab, Rainer Greifeneder

Open Access
5 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.