View

The Study

Dietary Omega-3 Fatty Acid, Ratio of Omega-6 to Omega-3 Intake, Inflammation, and Survival in Long-term Hemodialysis Patients

In simple terms

This study looked at what people ate and then watched to see who got sicker or died over time. It found that people who ate more omega-6 compared to omega-3 tended to have more inflammation and were more likely to die, but it didn’t change anyone’s diet to test if that caused the difference.

53%

Analysis score

53/ 72

Maximum 72 for a cohort study.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology25
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Cohort Study
Level 2b - Individual cohort study
What’s the bottom line?

This study looked at what people on long-term dialysis ate and saw if it made them more inflamed or more likely to die.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cohort Studies
Level 2b
53

53 / 100

Quality score

Groups of people are followed over time to see who develops an outcome. Strong for identifying risk factors and associations, but cannot prove causation as firmly as RCTs.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — a ratio of 9.3 is much higher than the 1:1 ratio humans evolved with, and even higher than the 5:1 ratio linked to less inflammation in other diseases.
  2. 2People who ate more omega-6 fats (like vegetable oil) compared to omega-3 fats (like fish) had higher inflammation (CRP went up by 0.55 mg/L per point increase in ratio).
  3. 3Those with the worst ratios were 61% more likely to die over 6 years, but this wasn't quite strong enough to be certain.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

American Journal of Kidney Diseases

Year

2011

Authors

Nazanin Noori, Ramanath Dukkipati, Csaba P. Kovesdy, John J. Sim, Usama Feroze, Sameer B. Murali, Rachelle Bross, Debbie Benner, Joel D. Kopple, Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh

Open Access
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (6)

Assertion

Among patients on long-term hemodialysis, a higher intake of omega-6 fats relative to omega-3 fats is linked to a measurable rise in blood levels of C-reactive protein over one year.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

Long-term hemodialysis patients consume a diet with a omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acid ratio of 9.3, which is higher than the ratio believed to have existed in human evolution and higher than the ratio linked to lower inflammation in other chronic conditions.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

Among patients on long-term hemodialysis, a higher intake of omega-6 fats relative to omega-3 fats is linked to higher levels of inflammation and a greater chance of death, even when accounting for other dietary and health factors.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

Eating too many omega-6 fats (like in vegetable oils) compared to omega-3 fats (like in fish) can make your body more inflamed, which can damage your blood vessels and lead to clogged arteries over time.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

Among patients on long-term hemodialysis, those consuming a diet with a higher ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids had a 61% higher rate of death over six years than those consuming a lower ratio.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

In patients on long-term hemodialysis, consuming more omega-3 fatty acids through diet did not change levels of C-reactive protein or affect survival over six years, although higher omega-3 intake was linked to a lower ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids.

Correlational
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.