View

The Study

Rosuvastatin in older patients with systolic heart failure.

In simple terms

This study gave one group of sick older people a pill and another group a fake pill to see if the real pill helped. It found the pill lowered bad cholesterol and made people less likely to go to the hospital, but it didn’t clearly stop heart attacks or deaths. So we know it helps a little with hospital visits, but we can’t say for sure it saves lives.

72%

Analysis score

72/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology93
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Doctors gave an old cholesterol drug to elderly people with weak hearts to see if it would help them live longer or avoid hospital visits.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
72

72 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Even though the drug improved blood markers, it didn't save lives — but it did help people avoid being hospitalized for heart issues, which matters for quality of life.
  2. 2The drug lowered bad cholesterol by 45% and inflammation by 37%, but didn't stop people from dying or having heart attacks.
  3. 3It did reduce hospital visits for heart problems by about 154 fewer per 1000 patients over 2.7 years.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

The New England journal of medicine

Year

2007

Authors

J. Kjekshus, E. Apetrei, V. Barrios, M. Böhm, J. Cleland, J. Cornel, P. Dunselman, C. Fonseca, A. Goudev, P. Grande, L. Gullestad, A. Hjalmarson, J. Hradec, A. Jánosi, G. Kamenský, M. Komajda, J. Korewicki, T. Kuusi, F. Mach, V. Mareev, J. McMurray, N. Ranjith, M. Schaufelberger, J. Vanhaecke, D. V. van Veldhuisen, F. Waagstein, H. Wedel, J. Wikstrand

Open Access
788 citations
Analysis v6

Related Content

Claims (8)

Assertion

For people who have already had a heart attack or are at very high risk for one, taking statins lowers the number of future heart attacks, strokes, or other cardiovascular events.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

In older adults with a specific type of heart failure, taking 10 mg of rosuvastatin daily for about 33 months led to 154 fewer hospitalizations for cardiovascular problems per 1000 people compared to those taking a placebo, even though it did not reduce deaths or major cardiovascular events.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

In older adults with a specific type of heart failure, taking 10 mg of rosuvastatin every day does not lead to higher rates of muscle problems, liver enzyme increases, or kidney dysfunction compared to taking a placebo.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

In older adults with a type of heart failure, taking 10 mg of rosuvastatin daily for about 2.7 years lowers LDL cholesterol by 45% and inflammation markers by 37% compared to a placebo, but this does not lead to fewer deaths or fewer heart attacks or strokes.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

In older adults with a type of heart failure caused by blocked arteries, taking 10 mg of rosuvastatin daily does not reduce the combined risk of dying from heart problems, having a heart attack, or having a stroke.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

In older adults with a type of heart failure, taking 10 mg of rosuvastatin daily for about 2.7 years does not change the rate of new diabetes cases or kidney function decline compared to taking a placebo.

Causal
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.