View

The Study

Effect of Aspirin on Disability-free Survival in the Healthy Elderly

In simple terms

This study is like a super-fair test where half the people got aspirin and half got sugar pills, and no one knew who got what. It found that aspirin didn't help people stay healthier longer, but it did cause more bleeding. We can say aspirin caused the bleeding because the test was so fair.

88%

Analysis score

88/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology100
Publication100
Statistical100
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists tested if taking a tiny aspirin every day helps older people live longer without getting sick, confused, or unable to do daily tasks.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
88

88 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1The difference in health outcomes was tiny and not meaningful — but the bleeding risk was real and significant, meaning more people had dangerous internal bleeding.
  2. 2Aspirin didn't help: 21.5 out of 1,000 people on aspirin had death, dementia, or disability vs.
  3. 321.2 on placebo.
  4. 4But aspirin caused more bleeding: 3.8% had major bleeding vs.
  5. 52.8% on placebo.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

The New England journal of medicine

Year

2018

Authors

J. McNeil, R. Woods, M. Nelson, C. Reid, B. Kirpach, R. Wolfe, E. Storey, R. Shah, J. Lockery, A. Tonkin, A. Newman, J. Williamson, K. Margolis, M. Ernst, W. Abhayaratna, N. Stocks, S. Fitzgerald, S. Orchard, R. Trevaks, L. Beilin, G. Donnan, P. Gibbs, C. Johnston, J. Ryan, B. Radziszewska, R. Grimm, A. Murray

Open Access
478 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.