View

The Study

Bempedoic Acid and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Statin-Intolerant Patients.

In simple terms

This study is like a fair test where half the people got a new medicine and half got a sugar pill, and no one knew who got what. After a few years, the people who took the medicine had fewer heart problems. So we can say the medicine probably helped—but only for people who can't take statins.

74%

Analysis score

74/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology100
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

This study tested a new pill called bempedoic acid in people who can't take statins because of side effects.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
74

74 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1For every 100 people who took this pill instead of a placebo, about 1 to 2 fewer had a heart attack or needed heart surgery over 3 years — a meaningful benefit for those who can't use statins.
  2. 2The pill lowered bad cholesterol by 29 mg/dL and cut heart attacks by 23%.
  3. 3It also lowered the chance of heart-related death, stroke, or needing a heart procedure by 13%.
  4. 4But it raised the risk of gout and gallstones.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

The New England journal of medicine

Year

2023

Authors

Nissen Se, Lincoff Am, Brennan D, Ray Kk, M. D, Kastelein Jjp, T. Pd, Libby P, Cho L, P. J., Bays He, Moriarty Pm, M. V., Grobbee De, Louie Mj, Chengho Cf, L. N, B. L, R. P, H. M, Sasiela Wj, M. J., Davey D, Fajardo-Campos P, P. P, Fedacko J, Zmuda W, L. Y, Nicholls Sj, Outcomes Investigators Nicholls Clear

Open Access
661 citations
Analysis v6
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.