View

The Study

Towards an unconscious neural reinforcement intervention for common fears

In simple terms

This study found that when people’s brains were trained to think about scary things without them even knowing it, their bodies reacted less fearfully — like their heart didn’t race as much. But it doesn’t mean the fear is gone for good, or that it works for people with real phobias.

72%

Analysis score

72/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting60
Methodology77
Publication100
Statistical54
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists taught people’s brains to stop reacting fearfully to spiders or snakes by rewarding them when their brain activity matched the pattern of fearing that animal — all while they were unaware of what they were being trained to do.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
72

72 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — this suggests a new way to treat phobias without making people confront their fears directly, which could help those who quit therapy because it's too scary.
  2. 2Fear responses dropped by medium effect sizes (d = 0.55–0.62).
  3. 3Participants couldn't guess which animal they were being trained on (47% accuracy = chance).
  4. 4Decoding accuracy using other people's brain data was 82.4%, better than using their own data (71.7%).

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Year

2018

Authors

V. Taschereau-Dumouchel, Aurelio Cortese, T. Chiba, J. Knotts, M. Kawato, H. Lau, H. Lau

Open Access
140 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (6)

Assertion

When a new rewarding behavior is introduced, it creates a competing neural pathway that replaces existing reward patterns linked to maladaptive habits.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

Using neural data from people who have never encountered certain feared animals, a computational method can identify brain patterns linked to those fears with 82.4% accuracy, surpassing methods that rely on data from the same individual, enabling fear reduction without direct exposure to the feared stimulus.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

After unconscious neural reinforcement, people cannot tell which fear was targeted in a forced-choice test, performing no better than random guessing.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

During fMRI-based training, targeted neural reinforcement activates the ventral temporal cortex without activating the amygdala or other fear-related brain regions, resulting in reduced fear responses through separation of fear-related neural patterns from emotional processing networks.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

When brain activity patterns associated with fear are detected and subtly reinforced using fMRI feedback, physiological fear responses to spiders or snakes decrease in healthy adults with mild fear, as shown by reduced amygdala activity and skin conductance.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

Neural reinforcement reduces fear of one specific animal without changing fear of other animals, showing the effect targets only the neural connection to that animal, not overall anxiety.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.