View

The Study

Factors influencing the accuracy of the repetition in reserve scale in resistance training: a systematic review

In simple terms

This is like reading a summary of many different reports about weight training. It shows that when people lift weights closer to their max effort, they seem to be better at guessing how many more reps they could do. But it can't prove that lifting this way actually causes better guessing - it just shows they often happen together.

20%

Analysis score

20/ 100

Maximum 100 for a systematic review.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology0
Publication100
Statistical0
Study type (basis of the score)
Systematic Review
Level 2a - Systematic review of cohort studies
What’s the bottom line?

This study looked at how accurately people can guess how many more reps they can do during weight training.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Reviews of Cohort Studies
Level 2a
20

20 / 100

Quality score

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of cohort studies. They sit above a single cohort study but below a single randomized trial, because the underlying evidence is still observational.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1People are better at judging effort when pushing closer to their limits and using heavier weights.
  2. 2Guesses are more accurate when closer to failure, with heavier weights, and for upper body exercises.
  3. 3Accuracy gets worse with more reps and lighter weights.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Physical Therapy Reviews

Year

2025

Authors

Filipe Russo, Priscila Marconcin, Diana Gomes, M. Peralta, F. Flôres, Nuno Casanova

Open Access
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.