The Study
Identification of the Fraction of Indolent Tumors and Associated Overdiagnosis in Breast Cancer Screening Trials
This study is like building a video game that simulates how breast cancer might grow, but it doesn't actually watch any real people. It tells us what might happen in the game, not what happens in real life.
Analysis score
Maximum 0 for a computational/algorithm study.
Where the score came from
Some breast cancers found by screening would never hurt you — they're too slow to ever cause problems. But we can't tell which ones they are just from screening data.
Where does this study sit?
Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)
Max 100Randomized Trials
Max 90Reviews of Cohort Studies
Max 85Cohort Studies
Max 72Reviews of Case-Control Studies
Max 63Case-Control Studies
Max 58Cross-Sectional & Case Series
Max 50Expert Opinion
Max 50 / 100
Quality score
Based on clinical experience or non-systematic literature reviews. The lowest level of evidence as they are most susceptible to bias and personal perspective.
Key takeaways
Summary
Based on the study abstract and findings.
- 1Yes — if we can't tell which tumors are harmless, we might treat too many people unnecessarily, causing harm without benefit.
- 2Extending follow-up after screening helps estimate how many tumors are harmless.
- 3Without long follow-up, models get it wrong — they think cancers grow faster and start earlier than they really do.
Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data
Publication
Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Year
2018
Authors
M. Ryser, R. Gulati, M. Eisenberg, Yu Shen, E. Hwang, Ruth Etzioni
Related Content
Claims (10)
Finding and treating very slow-growing cancers through aggressive screening doesn’t help people live longer overall — it just finds cancers that wouldn’t have hurt them anyway.
Some cancers found during routine screening might never hurt you — they grow so slowly that you’d die of something else before they ever became a problem.
When scientists try to figure out how fast breast cancer grows and how many tumors are slow-moving, their calculations get less accurate if the numbers they use for slow-growing tumors or fast-growing tumors are too low or too high.
If doctors don't keep an eye on breast cancer patients long enough after their last screening, they can't tell how fast the cancer is likely to grow — it's like trying to guess how long a candle will burn by only watching it for a few seconds.
If doctors keep checking on women longer after their last breast cancer screening, they can better tell which tumors would never cause harm and which ones are likely to grow quickly—especially when cancers tend to develop slowly.
When doctors stop screening for breast cancer, they can't tell exactly how many of the tumors found would never have caused harm, even with fancy math, because the data they have just isn't detailed enough to give clear answers.
Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.