View

The Study

Inflammatory biomarkers suPAR, IL-6, and hsCRP and 13-year risk of mortality and MACE in type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study

In simple terms

This study looked at people with diabetes and noticed that those with higher levels of certain blood markers tended to have more heart problems or die sooner. But it didn’t change anything to see if the markers caused the problems — it just watched what happened over time.

52%

Analysis score

52/ 72

Maximum 72 for a cohort study.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology37
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Cohort Study
Level 2b - Individual cohort study
What’s the bottom line?

Doctors tested blood markers of inflammation in people with type 2 diabetes to see who might have heart problems or die sooner.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cohort Studies
Level 2b
52

52 / 100

Quality score

Groups of people are followed over time to see who develops an outcome. Strong for identifying risk factors and associations, but cannot prove causation as firmly as RCTs.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — this means inflammation levels can help identify diabetic patients at highest risk, even when other risk factors are accounted for.
  2. 2People with the highest suPAR levels had a 70% chance of dying over 11 years; those with the lowest had only 19%.
  3. 3Having two high inflammation markers doubled or tripled the risk of death or heart events.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

European Heart Journal

Year

2025

Authors

H. Bahrami, P. Jørgensen, L. J. H. Rasmussen, J. Eugen-Olsen, P. Rossing, M. Jensen

Related Content

Claims (6)

Assertion

Higher levels of hsCRP in the blood are consistently found in individuals with systemic inflammation and are associated with worse health outcomes.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

Adding three blood biomarkers—suPAR, IL-6, and hsCRP—to the SCORE2-Diabetes risk calculator improves how accurately it identifies which adults with type 2 diabetes are at higher or lower risk of death or serious heart events.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

Among adults with type 2 diabetes, those with the highest levels of suPAR have a 70% chance of dying from any cause during the study period, while those with the lowest levels have a 19% chance.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

Adults with type 2 diabetes who have higher initial levels of the inflammatory biomarkers suPAR, IL-6, and hsCRP experience higher rates of death and serious heart problems over 11.4 years, with those in the highest suPAR group having a 70% death rate versus 19% in the lowest group.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

Adults with type 2 diabetes who have two or more elevated inflammatory biomarkers have a 1.9- to 2.5-fold higher risk of dying from any cause or experiencing a major cardiovascular event than those with one or none elevated, regardless of other known risk factors.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

Adults with type 2 diabetes who have higher levels of interleukin-6 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein have a 1.9- to 2.5-fold higher rate of serious heart events, such as heart failure, heart attacks, or strokes, over an average of 11.4 years of observation.

Correlational
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.