View

The Study

The impact of copper status on lubabegron fumarate-induced growth and adipose immune cell infiltration in beef feedlot steers

In simple terms

This study gave different groups of cows different amounts of copper and a growth medicine, then watched what happened. It found that the medicine worked better in cows with less copper in their livers. But this only tells us about cows—not people or other animals.

17%

Analysis score

17/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology62
Publication100
Statistical54
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Cows given a growth-promoting drug called lubabegron grow more muscle—but only if they don’t have too much copper in their liver. Too much copper makes the drug work poorly.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
17

17 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes—this means farmers can save money by adjusting copper levels in feed to make growth drugs work better, improving meat production efficiency.
  2. 2Cows with low copper (42 mg/kg liver) got 29% better at turning food into muscle.
  3. 3Cows with high copper (193 mg/kg) only got 6% better.
  4. 4The drug also made all cows more sensitive to insulin and increased their lean weight by 15%.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Journal of Animal Science

Year

2026

Authors

Jacob A Henderson, Jodi L. McGill, Stephanie L. Hansen

Open Access
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.