View

The Study

Differences in Bone Mineral Density between Adult Vegetarians and Nonvegetarians Become Marginal when Accounting for Differences in Anthropometric Factors.

In simple terms

This study looked at people who eat plants vs. people who eat meat and saw that plant-eaters sometimes had weaker bones—but it turned out that was mostly because they were thinner. It didn't prove eating plants makes bones weak; it just showed a link that went away when you considered body size.

40%

Analysis score

40/ 44

Maximum 44 for a cross-sectional study.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology19
Publication100
Statistical54
Study type (basis of the score)
Cross-Sectional Study
Level 4 - Case series
What’s the bottom line?

People who don't eat meat sometimes have slightly lower bone density, but this might be because they tend to be thinner, not because their diet is missing bone-building nutrients.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cross-Sectional & Case Series
Level 4
40

40 / 100

Quality score

Snapshots of a population at a single point in time, or descriptions of small groups. Can identify correlations and prevalence, but cannot determine cause and effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1The bone density differences are small and mostly explained by being thinner — not enough to suggest vegetarians are at high risk for fractures just from diet.
  2. 2Vegetarians had bone density of 0.77 g/cm² (hip) vs.
  3. 30.79 in meat-eaters — not a big difference after accounting for body size.
  4. 4Lower spine was 1.01 vs.
  5. 51.04 — a tiny but real difference.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

The Journal of nutrition

Year

2020

Authors

Nena Karavasiloglou, Eliška Selinger, J. Gojda, S. Rohrmann, T. Kühn

Open Access
22 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.

Why do vegetarians have weaker bones? — Quality Score & Summary | Fit Body Science