View

The Study

Creatine and Cognition in Aging: A Systematic Review of Evidence in Older Adults

In simple terms

This study looked at other studies that asked people how much creatine they ate and then checked their memory tests. It found that people who ate more creatine sometimes did better on memory tests, but that doesn’t mean creatine made them smarter — maybe they just ate healthier overall. It’s like noticing people who wear red shoes run faster — but red shoes don’t make you fast.

34%

Analysis score

34/ 85

Maximum 85 for a systematic review.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology0
Publication100
Statistical23
Study type (basis of the score)
Systematic Review
Level 2a - Systematic review of cohort studies
What’s the bottom line?

Some studies say older people who eat more creatine (found in meat) do better on memory tests, but other studies give them creatine pills and see no change.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Reviews of Cohort Studies
Level 2a
34

34 / 100

Quality score

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of cohort studies. They sit above a single cohort study but below a single randomized trial, because the underlying evidence is still observational.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1The results are mixed: eating more creatine-rich foods might be linked to better memory, but taking creatine pills for months didn't help in the only good-quality trial.
  2. 2Four studies found better memory/attention with higher creatine intake (over 0.95 g/day); one RCT gave 5 g/day for 24 weeks and found no improvement.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Nutrition Reviews

Year

2025

Authors

Samantha Marshall, Alexandra Kitzan, Jasmine Wright, Laura Bocicariu, Lindsay S Nagamatsu

Open Access
2 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.