View

The Study

Rapamycin Does Not Compromise Exercise‐Induced Muscular Adaptations in Female Mice

In simple terms

This study watched what happened to female mice who exercised and took different doses of a drug called rapamycin. It can show that certain things happened together, like higher doses being linked to worse blood sugar, but it can't prove the drug caused those effects.

11%

Analysis score

11/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology31
Publication100
Statistical23
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

We gave lady mice medicine called rapamycin either once a week or three times a week while they ran on special wheels for 8 weeks. We wanted to see if the medicine changed how strong or healthy they got from running.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
11

11 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Even though the mice got stronger, the sugar problems from rapamycin might be a concern for people using it while staying active.
  2. 2All running mice got stronger and their muscles grew bigger, no matter which medicine plan they were on.
  3. 3Mice on once-a-week medicine ran faster and farther.
  4. 4But both medicine groups had worse sugar control than the no-medicine runners.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Aging Cell

Year

2025

Authors

Christian J. Elliehausen, Szczepan S Olszewski, D. Minton, Carolyn G Shult, Aditya R. Ailiani, Michaela E Trautman, Reji Babygirija, Dudley Lamming, Troy A. Hornberger, Adam R. Konopka

Open Access
3 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (6)

Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.