View

The Study

The effects of supplementation with lutein and/or zeaxanthin on human macular pigment density and colour vision

In simple terms

This study watched what happened to 24 people’s eyes after they took special vitamins, and noticed that their yellow-blue vision didn’t change, but their red-green vision might have gotten a tiny bit better. But because we don’t know if they were randomly assigned or if the researchers knew who got the vitamins, we can’t say the vitamins caused the change.

20%

Analysis score

20/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology0
Publication100
Statistical0
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists gave people yellow supplements to see if it helped them tell colors apart, especially blue-yellow and red-green.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
20

20 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1The improvement in red-green vision is so small it likely doesn't matter in daily life; blue-yellow vision is unchanged.
  2. 2The supplements made the yellow pigment in the center of the eye thicker, but people still couldn't tell blue and yellow apart any better.
  3. 3They got slightly better at telling red and green apart, but only a tiny bit.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Year

2006

Authors

M. Rodriguez‐Carmona, J. Kvansakul, J. Alister Harlow, W. Köpcke, W. Schalch, J. Barbur

94 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.