View

The Study

Female athlete's heart: Systolic and diastolic function related to circulatory dimensions

In simple terms

This study looked at how athletes' hearts are different from non-athletes' hearts at one point in time. It found that athletes' hearts are bigger and pump more blood, and that bigger hearts are linked to better stamina — but it doesn't prove that training made their hearts bigger. Maybe they were born with bigger hearts and that's why they became athletes!

44%

Analysis score

44/ 44

Maximum 44 for a cross-sectional study.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology28
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Cross-Sectional Study
Level 4 - Case series
What’s the bottom line?

Female athletes who train hard for years develop bigger hearts that fill with more blood, helping them breathe better and run faster.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cross-Sectional & Case Series
Level 4
44

44 / 100

Quality score

Snapshots of a population at a single point in time, or descriptions of small groups. Can identify correlations and prevalence, but cannot determine cause and effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1These differences mean athletes' hearts pump more blood per beat, allowing them to use 33% more oxygen during intense exercise — a major advantage in endurance sports.
  2. 2Athletes had 114 mL vs.
  3. 386 mL left heart volume, 35 mm vs.
  4. 431 mm right heart width, 18 cm² vs.
  5. 514 cm² left atrium, 27% higher E/A ratio, 15% greater right heart movement, and 52 mL/kg/min vs.
  6. 639 mL/kg/min VO2max.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports

Year

2015

Authors

K. Hedman, É. Tamás, Jan Henriksson, N. Bjarnegård, Lars Brudin, Eva Nylander

Open Access
27 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (6)

Assertion

During exercise, the proportion of time the heart spends contracting versus relaxing is different in endurance athletes compared to people who are not trained athletes.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

In women who are either endurance athletes or non-athletes, the amount of blood the left ventricle holds just before it contracts explains 50.3% of the differences in their maximum oxygen consumption during exercise, showing that heart filling capacity strongly influences aerobic performance.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

Female endurance athletes have a higher ratio of early to late heart filling during rest compared to non-athletes, due to faster early filling and slower late filling, which reflects more efficient relaxation of the left ventricle.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

Female endurance athletes have a 52 mL/kg/min maximal oxygen uptake, while non-athletic women have a 39 mL/kg/min maximal oxygen uptake. This difference reflects a 33% higher aerobic capacity in athletes due to long-term endurance training.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

Female endurance athletes have measurably larger heart chambers and atria than women of the same age who do not train endurance sports, even when accounting for body size.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

Female endurance athletes have a 15% greater movement of the heart's lower right chamber during pumping compared to non-athletes, with measurements of 21 mm versus 19 mm, and this difference persists even when accounting for differences in the size of the left ventricle.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.