View

The Study

Exercise echocardiography for improved assessment of diastolic filling dynamics

In simple terms

This study looked at how well-trained athletes' hearts work during exercise compared to people who don't train much. It found that athletes' hearts fill with blood better when they're working hard — but we can't say that training made their hearts better, because they were already athletes before the study started.

55%

Analysis score

55/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology21
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Athletes' hearts don't beat faster than others during exercise — they fill up with more blood between beats, letting them pump out more blood each time.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
55

55 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — this means athletes can deliver more oxygen to muscles during intense exercise without speeding up their heart, giving them a major performance edge.
  2. 2At the same heart rate (140 bpm), athletes had 63% higher stroke volume and 3x faster heart filling than untrained people, even though standard heart tests showed no difference.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Experimental Physiology

Year

2025

Authors

Mads Fischer, T. Bonne, M. B. Klaris, Emil Lenzing, Eric J. Stöhr, J. Bejder, Carsten Lundby, N. B. Nordsborg, Lars Nybo

Open Access
3 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (10)

Assertion

Endurance athletes have a longer time for blood to fill the heart between beats while at rest, which allows more blood to enter the heart with each cycle, without their heart beating faster than that of non-athletes.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

During intense exercise, endurance athletes have faster blood flow in the heart's pumping phase to compensate for less time available for the heart to fill with blood between beats.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

During exercise, endurance athletes have a shorter cardiac cycle than non-athletes, with both the time the heart spends pumping blood and the time it spends filling with blood reduced more significantly.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

Athletes who train for endurance have a 63% larger increase in the amount of blood their heart pumps per beat during exercise at 140 beats per minute than untrained people, even when their heart rates are the same, due to greater filling of the heart during relaxation.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

When exercising at the same heart rate, elite endurance athletes have a 50% higher rate of blood filling the left ventricle of the heart compared to untrained people, a difference caused by training adaptations that are not visible when the heart is at rest.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

When heart rate is controlled during exercise, standard echocardiographic measurements such as mitral E-wave velocity, tissue Doppler velocities, and left ventricular twist show no difference between endurance-trained athletes and untrained individuals, meaning these measurements cannot detect the cardiac changes caused by endurance training.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.