View

The Study

Australopithecus at Sterkfontein did not consume substantial mammalian meat.

In simple terms

This study looked at the chemical makeup of ancient teeth to guess what these early human ancestors ate. It found their teeth looked more like those of animals that only eat plants, not meat-eaters. But it didn't prove they never ate meat — just that if they did, it wasn't much.

44%

Analysis score

44/ 44

Maximum 44 for a cross-sectional study.

Where the score came from

Reporting100
Methodology1
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Cross-Sectional Study
Level 4 - Case series
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists checked the teeth of ancient ape-like creatures from 3.5 million years ago to see what they ate by analyzing chemical traces in their enamel.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cross-Sectional & Case Series
Level 4
44

44 / 100

Quality score

Snapshots of a population at a single point in time, or descriptions of small groups. Can identify correlations and prevalence, but cannot determine cause and effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1This means these early ancestors probably didn't eat meat regularly, even though their brains were starting to get bigger.
  2. 2The chemical signs in 7 teeth matched those of plant-eating animals like antelopes, not meat-eaters like lions.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Science

Year

2025

Authors

Tina Lüdecke, J. Leichliter, Dominic Stratford, D. Sigman, H. Vonhof, G. Haug, M. Bamford, Alfredo Martínez-García

15 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (7)

Assertion

Throughout most of human evolutionary history, the diet of early human ancestors consisted mainly of animal-based foods, with meat being the main source of nutrition.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

Between 1.2 million and a few hundred thousand years ago, early human ancestors like Homo and Neanderthals relied mainly on meat and other animal foods for nutrition, while earlier ancestors like Australopithecus ate mostly plants.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

Analysis of carbon isotopes in fossilized teeth from ancient Australopithecus hominins shows they ate mostly plants like trees and shrubs, not grasses, even though grasses were common in their environment.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

Analysis of chemical traces in fossilized teeth shows that Australopithecus ate plants similar to those consumed by herbivorous animals of the same time period, rather than meat like predators.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

Dietary patterns inferred from the isotopic data of seven Australopithecus fossils from Sterkfontein cannot be assumed to apply to all Australopithecus or other early human ancestors because the sample is too small and comes from a limited time and place.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

Analysis of fossilized tooth enamel from ancient Australopithecus individuals shows chemical signatures that match those of animals eating mostly plants, not meat, suggesting they did not regularly consume mammalian flesh.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.