View

The Study

A randomized controlled trial to isolate the effects of fasting and energy restriction on weight loss and metabolic health in lean adults

In simple terms

This study compared two ways of eating: one where people ate less every day, and another where they fasted every other day. Because people were randomly assigned, we can say that one method probably caused more fat loss than the other — but only for these people in these 3 weeks.

60%

Analysis score

60/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology60
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

This study compared two ways to lose weight: eating less every day vs. fasting every other day.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
60

60 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1The difference in fat loss between daily restriction and fasting is meaningful — daily restriction worked better.
  2. 2Eating 75% of normal calories every day lost 1.75 kg of fat.
  3. 3Fasting every other day but eating the same total calories lost only 0.74 kg of fat.
  4. 4Fasting without eating less didn't lose any fat.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Science Translational Medicine

Year

2021

Authors

Iain Templeman, Harry A. Smith, Enhad A. Chowdhury, Yung-Chih Chen, H. Carroll, Drusus A. Johnson-Bonson, Aaron Hengist, R. Smith, Jade Creighton, D. Clayton, I. Varley, L. Karagounis, A. Wilhelmsen, K. Tsintzas, S. Reeves, J. Walhin, J. Gonzalez, D. Thompson, J. Betts

Open Access
103 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.