View

The Study

Effect of iron dose in maternal multiple micronutrient supplement on perceived side effects, adherence, acceptability and preferences: protocol for a randomised crossover trial

In simple terms

This study asked pregnant women to try three different pill types and say which they liked best and which made them feel sick. It doesn't prove that one pill makes babies healthier, but it does show which pill women are more likely to keep taking because it feels better.

45%

Analysis score

45/ 45

Maximum 45 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology70
Publication100
Statistical100
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Doctors give pregnant women pills with iron to help them stay healthy. Some pills have more iron, some have less. This study gave women all three kinds, one at a time, and asked how they felt.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
45

45 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — lower iron doses (30 mg) work just as well as higher ones (60 mg) in terms of how women feel and whether they keep taking them, which could make public health programs easier to run.
  2. 2Women took 30 mg, 45 mg, and 60 mg iron pills.
  3. 3They felt just as okay with the 30 mg pills as the 60 mg ones — same number of side effects, same adherence, same preference.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

BMJ Open

Year

2026

Authors

Christopher R Sudfeld, A. Muhihi, A. Sylvetsky, Emmy Metta, Victoria S. Brownlee, Erin Oakley, M. Bakari, W. Fawzi, Shabani Kinyogoli, Jordan R. Kuiper, Sabina Mugusi, Qing Pan, Mary M. Sando, B. Wylie, H. Masanja, Emily R. Smith, A. Pembe

Open Access
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.