The Study
Neither repetition duration nor number of muscle actions affect strength increases, body composition, muscle size, or fasted blood glucose in trained males and females.
This study compared three different ways of lifting weights and found that all of them made people stronger in about the same way. But it didn't prove that one way is better than another — just that none of them were clearly better in this group.
Analysis score
Maximum 45 for a randomized controlled trial.
Where the score came from
This study tested if lifting weights super slow, normal speed, or super slow with weird pauses made people stronger — as long as they lifted until they couldn't do another rep.
Where does this study sit?
Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)
Max 100Randomized Trials
Max 90Reviews of Cohort Studies
Max 85Cohort Studies
Max 72Reviews of Case-Control Studies
Max 63Case-Control Studies
Max 58Cross-Sectional & Case Series
Max 50Expert Opinion
Max 545 / 100
Quality score
Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.
Key takeaways
Summary
Based on the study abstract and findings.
- 1Yes — you don’t need to lift slowly to get stronger; lifting hard to failure matters more than speed, and you can get strong with just one set twice a week.
- 2All groups got stronger by about 5–10 kg on chest press, leg press, and pull-downs — no matter if they lifted slow, normal, or super slow.
- 3No changes in muscle size or blood sugar.
Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data
Publication
Journal
Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme
Year
2019
Authors
L. Carlson, Brandon Jonker, W. Westcott, J. Steele, J. Fisher
Related Content
Claims (6)
In people who already train regularly, doing one set of machine-based exercises twice a week for 10 weeks increases muscular strength without needing multiple sets or high volume.
When trained individuals lift weights with the same total load and time under tension, their strength gains are the same whether they lift slowly or quickly, as long as they push to complete muscular failure.
In trained individuals, lifting weights until complete muscular fatigue produces greater strength gains than varying the speed of movement or the number of repetitions performed.
In people who are already physically trained, doing resistance training to failure with controlled weight and volume for 10 weeks does not change body composition, muscle size, or fasting blood glucose levels.
In people who are already physically trained, resistance training is associated with a small and statistically insignificant drop in fasting blood glucose levels, and this change does not have a clear clinical impact.
When lifting weights with slow, controlled movements—10 seconds up and 4 seconds down—muscle growth is lower than when using faster, standard tempos of 1–2 seconds up and 1–2 seconds down, provided the total workload and effort are the same.
Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.