View

The Study

Quality and reliability assessment of myocardial infarction short videos on Bilibili and TikTok: A cross-sectional study

In simple terms

This study looked at a bunch of short videos about heart attacks on two apps and counted what they talked about and how good they seemed. It didn’t test if watching them changes how people behave or get healthier—it just described what’s out there.

44%

Analysis score

44/ 44

Maximum 44 for a cross-sectional study.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology17
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Cross-Sectional Study
Level 4 - Case series
What’s the bottom line?

Lots of short videos about heart attacks exist on TikTok and Bilibili, but most only show symptoms and treatment — not how to avoid getting one in the first place.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cross-Sectional & Case Series
Level 4
44

44 / 100

Quality score

Snapshots of a population at a single point in time, or descriptions of small groups. Can identify correlations and prevalence, but cannot determine cause and effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1This is dangerous because people might think popular videos are trustworthy — but they’re missing key info on how to prevent heart attacks, which could save lives.
  2. 2Only 4.25% of videos talked about prevention; 15% talked about long-term risk.
  3. 3Videos by real doctors scored much higher on quality checks.
  4. 4But videos with the most likes, shares, and comments were NOT the most accurate ones.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Digital Health

Year

2026

Authors

Juan Tao, Yimin Lin, Kaidi Zhao, Haogeng Wang, Yang Shi

Open Access
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (6)

Assertion

Health and nutrition messages based on scientific facts receive less public attention and commercial promotion than exaggerated or sensationalized versions.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

As of August 2025, most short videos about heart attacks on TikTok and Bilibili focus on symptoms, causes, and treatments, but very few explain how to prevent heart attacks or understand population-level risk, with only 4.25% of videos covering prevention and 15.03% covering epidemiology.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

On TikTok and Bilibili, videos about heart attacks that get the most likes and shares are not necessarily more accurate or informative than videos with fewer interactions — popularity doesn’t mean quality.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

Most heart attack videos on TikTok and Bilibili are only moderately accurate — they often lack citations, omit key facts, and don’t clearly state where their information comes from, making it hard for viewers to judge reliability.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

Heart specialist videos on TikTok and Bilibili are consistently more accurate and complete than videos made by non-experts, indicating that professional medical knowledge improves the reliability of health information on these platforms.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

Heart attack videos on TikTok are shorter and get more likes and shares than those on Bilibili, but both platforms have similar levels of medical accuracy — meaning how the platform works affects how people watch, not how accurate the information is.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.