View

The Study

Skeletal muscle adaptations to high‐intensity, low‐volume concurrent resistance and interval training in recreationally active men and women

In simple terms

This study watched what happened to people after they did a specific workout for 12 weeks. It saw that their muscles got stronger and some parts changed, but it didn't compare them to people who didn't do the workout. So we can't say the workout definitely caused the changes—maybe they were already changing for other reasons.

47%

Analysis score

47/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology17
Publication100
Statistical54
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

People did short, tough workouts three times a week for 12 weeks — lifting heavy and doing sprint-like moves — to see if they got stronger and their muscles changed.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
47

47 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — you can get stronger and build muscle with minimal training time, but if you want better cardio, you need more aerobic-specific work.
  2. 2Men’s muscle fibers grew by about 13%; women’s didn’t.
  3. 3Both sexes got stronger, gained lean mass, and their muscles shifted toward more fatigue-resistant types.
  4. 4But their heart/lung fitness didn’t improve.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Physiological Reports

Year

2024

Authors

Adam J. Sterczala, Nathaniel Rodriguez-Ortiz, Evan D. Feigel, K. Krajewski, Brian J Martin, Nicole M Sekel, M. Lovalekar, Chris K Kargl, Kristen J. Koltun, C. V. van Eck, Shawn D. Flanagan, Chris Connaboy, S. Wardle, T. O’Leary, J. Greeves, B. Nindl

Open Access
12 citations
Analysis v6

Related Content

Claims (6)

Assertion

People who have previously built muscle can maintain that muscle with low training volume if they train at high intensity.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

After 12 weeks of high-intensity, low-volume concurrent training, recreationally active men experience a 12.9% increase in type I muscle fiber size and a 12.7% increase in type IIa muscle fiber size, while recreationally active women do not show similar increases in these muscle fiber sizes, even though both groups gain equal strength and lean body mass.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

After 12 weeks of high-intensity, low-volume combined strength and endurance training, the proportion of type IIx muscle fibers decreases by about 1.9% in men and women, while the number of capillaries and COX IV protein levels remain unchanged.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

After 12 weeks of high-intensity, low-volume combined endurance and strength training, skeletal muscle shows a 29.7% increase in PGC-1α and an 11.0% increase in citrate synthase, but no change in COX IV levels.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

After 12 weeks of a specific high-intensity training program that combines strength and interval exercises, recreationally active men and women gain muscle strength and lean body mass, but their aerobic endurance does not improve.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

In recreationally active men and women, a 12-week concurrent training program that improves strength and muscle mass does not increase aerobic capacity (VO2peak).

Descriptive
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.