View

The Study

Influence of rapamycin on safety and healthspan metrics after one year: PEARL trial results

In simple terms

This study is like a fair test where people were randomly given either a real pill or a fake one, and no one knew who got which. It can show whether the pill probably caused changes, especially for safety. But because not many people were in the test, and only some groups (like women) showed benefits, we can’t be totally sure the results apply to everyone.

64%

Analysis score

64/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology86
Publication100
Statistical54
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists gave an anti-aging drug called rapamycin to older adults once a week for a year to see if it made them healthier and safer.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
64

64 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1The results suggest the drug might help older adults, especially women, feel better and stay stronger, even if it doesn’t change fat levels.
  2. 2The drug didn’t reduce belly fat.
  3. 3But women taking 10 mg had more muscle and less pain.
  4. 4People taking 5 mg felt healthier overall.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Aging (Albany NY)

Year

2025

Authors

M. Moel, G. Harinath, V. Lee, A. Nyquist, Stefanie L. Morgan, Anar Isman, Sajad Zalzala

Open Access
16 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.