View

The Study

1411-P: Relative and Absolute Risk Reduction for MACE in Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials with GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with and without ASCVD at Baseline

In simple terms

This study looked at many big experiments where people were randomly given either a new medicine or a sugar pill. It found that the medicine helps reduce heart problems, especially in people who already had heart disease. But it doesn't prove why it works—just that it does.

60%

Analysis score

60/ 100

Maximum 100 for a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology38
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Level 1a - Systematic review of RCTs
What’s the bottom line?

These drugs lower heart attack and stroke risk in diabetics, but how much they help depends on whether you already have heart disease.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)
Level 1a
60

60 / 100

Quality score

The highest quality evidence. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses that pool randomized controlled trials, giving the most reliable summary of experimental evidence.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1For someone with heart disease, treating 47 people prevents one major event — that’s a strong benefit.
  2. 2For someone without heart disease, you’d need to treat 109 people to prevent one event — much less efficient.
  3. 3In diabetics with existing heart disease: 2.12% fewer had heart events over 3 years (NNT=47).
  4. 4In diabetics without heart disease: 0.92% fewer had heart events (NNT=109).
  5. 5The percentage reduction was similar (17% vs.
  6. 611%).

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Diabetes

Year

2026

Authors

Michael A. Nauck, B. Stratmann, S. Reger-Tan, Y. Lee-Barkey

Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.