View

The Study

(–)-Epicatechin Supplementation Inhibits Aerobic Adaptations to Cycling Exercise in Humans

In simple terms

This study watched two groups of people who did the same bike training for a month — one took a supplement and one took a fake pill. It can show if the supplement group changed differently than the other group, but it can't prove the supplement caused those differences because we don’t know for sure how people were picked for each group.

45%

Analysis score

45/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology34
Publication100
Statistical54
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

This study tested if a chemical from dark chocolate helps people get fitter when they bike for 4 weeks.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
45

45 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Even though the supplement came from chocolate and sounded healthy, it actually blocked key fitness improvements from exercise.
  2. 2The chocolate chemical (–)-epicatechin (200 mg/day) did not help.
  3. 3People taking it did not improve their oxygen use (VO2) or muscle energy factories (SDH), while those on placebo did.
  4. 4Both groups got better at short bursts of power.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Frontiers in Nutrition

Year

2018

Authors

Neil A. Schwarz, Zachary J. Blahnik, Srihari Prahadeeswaran, Sarah K. McKinley-Barnard, S. Holden, Andy Waldhelm

Open Access
36 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.