View

The Study

Modulating the gut microbiota in Crohn’s disease: a pilot study on the impact of a plant-based diet with DNA-based monitoring

In simple terms

This study watched 14 people eat more plants for 12 weeks and noticed their gut bacteria and inflammation markers changed. But because there was no group that didn’t change their diet, we can’t be sure the plants caused the changes—maybe they just felt better because they slept more or drank more water.

46%

Analysis score

46/ 72

Maximum 72 for a cohort study.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology14
Publication100
Statistical54
Study type (basis of the score)
Cohort Study
Level 2b - Individual cohort study
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists gave 14 people with Crohn’s disease a diet full of different plants for 12 weeks to see if it helped their gut bacteria and reduced inflammation.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cohort Studies
Level 2b
46

46 / 100

Quality score

Groups of people are followed over time to see who develops an outcome. Strong for identifying risk factors and associations, but cannot prove causation as firmly as RCTs.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1The drop in inflammation is promising and matches what doctors hope for, but since the study was small and had no comparison group, we can't say for sure the diet caused the change.
  2. 2People ate 1.4x more kinds of plants; their gut inflammation marker (calprotectin) dropped by 56%; good bacteria like Faecalibacterium went up; but overall gut bacteria diversity didn't change enough to be sure it was real (p=0.089).

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Frontiers in Nutrition

Year

2024

Authors

Stine Karstenskov Østergaard, Zeynep Cetin, Henrik Højgaard Rasmussen, H. Lærke, Mette Holst, Charlotte Lauridsen, J. L. Nielsen

Open Access
1 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (7)

Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.