View

The Study

No Association between Low-Calorie Sweetener (LCS) Use and Overall Cancer Risk in the Nationally Representative Database in the US: Analyses of NHANES 1988–2018 Data and 2019 Public-Use Linked Mortality Files

In simple terms

This study looked at a big group of US adults and checked whether people who use low-calorie sweeteners were more likely to die from cancer. It found no link. But because it didn’t randomly assign people to use or not use sweeteners, we can’t say for sure that the sweeteners had nothing to do with cancer risk—it just shows they weren’t clearly connected in this group.

60%

Analysis score

60/ 72

Maximum 72 for a cohort study.

Where the score came from

Reporting35
Methodology56
Publication100
Statistical54
Study type (basis of the score)
Cohort Study
Level 2b - Individual cohort study
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists checked if people who drink diet sodas or use sugar substitutes are more likely to die from cancer using real health data from thousands of Americans over many years.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cohort Studies
Level 2b
60

60 / 100

Quality score

Groups of people are followed over time to see who develops an outcome. Strong for identifying risk factors and associations, but cannot prove causation as firmly as RCTs.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Even though some people worry artificial sweeteners cause cancer, this big study found no real link over decades of health tracking.
  2. 2People who used low-calorie sweeteners had about the same chance of dying from cancer as those who didn’t.
  3. 3For example, the risk was 1.00 times for aspartame users and 0.96 times for saccharin users—very close to no difference.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Nutrients

Year

2022

Authors

V. Fulgoni, A. Drewnowski

Open Access
19 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.