Study analysis · Nutrients · 2023
Protein shakes after workouts are a multi-billion dollar industry—but this study shows they might be useless if you already eat enough protein.
If you already eat enough protein every day, adding a protein shake or chia drink after your workout doesn't build more muscle or strength than just lifting weights alone.
Overview
What the study found
The study in plain English — the bottom line, every takeaway we extracted, and what to do with them.
In simple terms
This study is like a test where they gave three groups of people the same exercise program, but one group got a special drink with chia, one with whey protein, and one with just juice. They measured muscle and strength before and after. They found that all groups got stronger and gained muscle, but the drinks didn't make a difference. So this study shows that for these people, the extra protein drinks didn't help more than the exercise alone.
What’s the bottom line?
We tested if drinking a protein shake or chia drink after workouts helps build more muscle than just working out alone. In young men who already eat enough protein, it didn't help.
How strong is this study?
The study was done carefully - they randomly assigned people to groups, and the people didn't know which drink they got. But there were only 18 people total, which is a small number, so we can't be very sure that the results would be the same for everyone. Also, they only studied young men who already eat a lot of protein, so we can't say the same for other people.
40 / 100
- COI disclosure+40/40
- Data availabilitydata not shared
- Code availabilitycode not shared
70 / 100
- Randomization+20/20
- Blinding+9/15
- Control group+15/15
- Sample size (n=18)+1.7/20
- Follow-up+10/10
100 / 100
46 / 100
- P-values+15/15
- Effect sizeno effect size reported
- Confidence intervals+15/15
- Pre-registrationnot pre-registered
Each component is scored out of 100 and then capped by the study design — a case series cannot reach the ceiling a randomised trial can, however well it is reported.
Where it sits
RCT reviewsReviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)
Max 100Randomized TrialsRandomized Trials
Max 90Reviews of Cohort StudiesReviews of Cohort Studies
Max 85Cohort StudiesCohort Studies
Max 72Reviews of Case-Control StudiesReviews of Case-Control Studies
Max 63Case-Control StudiesCase-Control Studies
Max 58Cross-Sectional & Case SeriesCross-Sectional & Case Series
Max 50Expert OpinionExpert Opinion
Max 564 / 100
Probability of being correct
Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.
This design can establish causation. As an RCT, this study can establish causal relationships, but the null result is limited by the small sample size (n=18) and the specific population (healthy untrained young men with high habitual protein intake). The absence of a significant effect does not prove that no effect exists in other populations or under different conditions.
No Conflicts
No conflicts of interest identified
No conflicts of interest were declared in the provided text. The study appears to be independently conducted.
The study uses commercial products (Benexia chia powder, Syntrax whey protein, Daily juice) but no funding or COI is disclosed. The full paper may contain a COI statement not included in the provided excerpt.
Key takeaways
- 01
All groups gained 2-3% more muscle and got stronger, but the protein drinks didn't add extra gains.
- 02
For people with high protein diets, extra supplements may not be needed.
Surprising findings
- Neither whey protein nor chia flour improved muscle or strength gains compared to placebo in young men with high protein intake.Most fitness culture emphasizes post-workout protein as crucial, and previous studies often show benefits, but this contradicts that when total protein is high, extra doesn't help.
- The placebo group gained 3.0% fat-free mass, which was not significantly different from the whey group's 2.3% and chia group's 3.6%.Even without any protein supplement, beginners can gain muscle from training alone, and adding protein didn't add extra.
- Participants couldn't guess which supplement they received – all were blinded successfully.The placebo was a sugar-free orange juice, but participants didn't know if they got protein or not, so the psychological effect of knowing you're taking something might not matter.
Practical takeaways
If you already eat 1.2-1.5 g/kg of protein daily, you probably don't need to rush a protein shake after your workout – just hit your daily protein target.
This study only looked at young untrained men with high protein intake; if you're older, vegan, or eat less protein, you might still benefit from supplements.
medium confidenceFocus on total daily protein intake rather than obsessing over post-workout timing or source.
The study was short (8 weeks) and small (n=6 per group), so longer-term effects might differ.
medium confidenceIf you're a beginner, just lifting weights consistently will build muscle even without supplements – don't think you need protein shakes to see gains.
All groups gained muscle, so training itself is effective.
high confidenceWhy this study matters
The 'muscle full' effect: when extra protein does nothing
In this 8-week study, 18 untrained young men who already consumed 1.3–1.5 g/kg/day of protein gained 2.3–3.6% fat-free mass from resistance training alone, but adding 23g whey protein or 20g chia protein after each workout gave no extra benefit. The 'muscle full' hypothesis suggests that once your body has enough amino acids, extra protein doesn't trigger more muscle growth.
Most gym-goers believe protein timing is critical, but this shows that total daily protein intake matters more than the supplement you chug after a workout.
Chia vs. whey: plant protein doesn't lag behind animal protein
Chia flour (20g protein, 3g omega-3) performed just as well as whey protein (23g) and placebo in terms of muscle and strength gains. All groups improved similarly, with no significant differences between them.
Plant-based protein sources are often considered inferior, but this study suggests that when total protein is adequate, the source doesn't matter for muscle gains.
The placebo group gained just as much muscle as the protein groups
The placebo group (no protein supplement) gained 3.0% fat-free mass, while whey gained 2.3% and chia gained 3.6% – no statistical difference. Strength gains were also similar across all groups.
This challenges the idea that post-workout protein is essential for muscle growth, especially for beginners.
The study's limitations: small sample, short duration, only young men
Only 18 young men (6 per group) were studied for 8 weeks, and all were untrained and had high habitual protein intake. This limits generalizability to other populations like women, older adults, or those with lower protein intake.
It's important to know that this 'no effect' might not apply to everyone – vegans, vegetarians, or elderly might still benefit from supplements.
Want the whole report?
Detailed mode opens the full scientific breakdown — every score component, the methodology, conflicts of interest, the evidence analysis behind each claim, and the raw study data.
Overview
What the study found
The study in plain English — the bottom line, every takeaway we extracted, and what to do with them.
Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a healthcare professional. Terms
We tested if drinking a protein shake or chia drink after workouts helps build more muscle than just working out alone. In young men who already eat enough protein, it didn't help.
Research results
All groups gained 2-3% more muscle and got stronger, but the protein drinks didn't add extra gains.
What this means - more context
For people with high protein diets, extra supplements may not be needed.
To compare the potential additional effect of chia flour, whey protein, or a placebo on fat-free mass and strength gains in untrained young men undergoing an 8-week resistance training program.
In 18 healthy untrained young men, an 8-week resistance training program increased fat-free mass and strength similarly across all groups. Neither whey protein (23g) nor chia flour (20g protein) supplementation after each training session provided additional benefits compared to placebo, likely because participants already consumed a habitual high protein diet (>1.2 g/kg/day).
Methods Used
Randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial with 18 untrained young men (age 22.4±3.1 y) assigned to placebo, chia flour (50g, 20g protein, 3g n-3), or whey protein (30g, 23g protein) consumed after each training session. Training was 3x/week for 8 weeks. Body composition via DXA, strength via 1RM tests.
Main Finding
No significant group-by-time interaction for fat-free mass (WG +2.3%, CG +3.6%, PG +3.0%) or strength gains; neither supplement enhanced effects beyond training. All groups improved similarly.
Confidence Level
Moderate: small sample size (n=6 per group), short duration, single-blinded, but randomized controlled design.
Study Flags
Red Flags
- •Small sample size (n=6 per group)
- •Short duration (8 weeks)
- •Only young men with high habitual protein intake
Surprising Findings
Neither whey protein nor chia flour improved muscle or strength gains compared to placebo in young men with high protein intake.
Most fitness culture emphasizes post-workout protein as crucial, and previous studies often show benefits, but this contradicts that when total protein is high, extra doesn't help.
Practical Takeaways
If you already eat 1.2-1.5 g/kg of protein daily, you probably don't need to rush a protein shake after your workout – just hit your daily protein target.
RCT reviewsReviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)
Max 100Randomized TrialsRandomized Trials
Max 90Reviews of Cohort StudiesReviews of Cohort Studies
Max 85Cohort StudiesCohort Studies
Max 72Reviews of Case-Control StudiesReviews of Case-Control Studies
Max 63Case-Control StudiesCase-Control Studies
Max 58Cross-Sectional & Case SeriesCross-Sectional & Case Series
Max 50Expert OpinionExpert Opinion
Max 564 / 100
Probability of being correct
Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.
Human RCT
Subject
Moderate probability
on the GRADE evidence scale
This study is like a test where they gave three groups of people the same exercise program, but one group got a special drink with chia, one with whey protein, and one with just juice. They measured muscle and strength before and after. They found that all groups got stronger and gained muscle, but the drinks didn't make a difference. So this study shows that for these people, the extra protein drinks didn't help more than the exercise alone.
The study has a COI section but no disclosure was found. A small penalty has been applied.
Strengths
- Randomized controlled design
- Single-blinded (participants blinded)
- Supervised resistance training
Weaknesses
- Small sample size (6 per group)
- Single-blinded (assessors not blinded)
- Short duration (8 weeks)
Methodology
Evidence Keywords
Statistical Reporting
Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a healthcare professional. Terms
We tested if drinking a protein shake or chia drink after workouts helps build more muscle than just working out alone. In young men who already eat enough protein, it didn't help.
Research results
All groups gained 2-3% more muscle and got stronger, but the protein drinks didn't add extra gains.
What this means - more context
For people with high protein diets, extra supplements may not be needed.
To compare the potential additional effect of chia flour, whey protein, or a placebo on fat-free mass and strength gains in untrained young men undergoing an 8-week resistance training program.
In 18 healthy untrained young men, an 8-week resistance training program increased fat-free mass and strength similarly across all groups. Neither whey protein (23g) nor chia flour (20g protein) supplementation after each training session provided additional benefits compared to placebo, likely because participants already consumed a habitual high protein diet (>1.2 g/kg/day).
Methods Used
Randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial with 18 untrained young men (age 22.4±3.1 y) assigned to placebo, chia flour (50g, 20g protein, 3g n-3), or whey protein (30g, 23g protein) consumed after each training session. Training was 3x/week for 8 weeks. Body composition via DXA, strength via 1RM tests.
Main Finding
No significant group-by-time interaction for fat-free mass (WG +2.3%, CG +3.6%, PG +3.0%) or strength gains; neither supplement enhanced effects beyond training. All groups improved similarly.
Confidence Level
Moderate: small sample size (n=6 per group), short duration, single-blinded, but randomized controlled design.
Study Flags
Red Flags
- •Small sample size (n=6 per group)
- •Short duration (8 weeks)
- •Only young men with high habitual protein intake
Surprising Findings
Neither whey protein nor chia flour improved muscle or strength gains compared to placebo in young men with high protein intake.
Most fitness culture emphasizes post-workout protein as crucial, and previous studies often show benefits, but this contradicts that when total protein is high, extra doesn't help.
Practical Takeaways
If you already eat 1.2-1.5 g/kg of protein daily, you probably don't need to rush a protein shake after your workout – just hit your daily protein target.
RCT reviewsReviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)
Max 100Randomized TrialsRandomized Trials
Max 90Reviews of Cohort StudiesReviews of Cohort Studies
Max 85Cohort StudiesCohort Studies
Max 72Reviews of Case-Control StudiesReviews of Case-Control Studies
Max 63Case-Control StudiesCase-Control Studies
Max 58Cross-Sectional & Case SeriesCross-Sectional & Case Series
Max 50Expert OpinionExpert Opinion
Max 564 / 100
Probability of being correct
Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.
Human RCT
Subject
Moderate probability
on the GRADE evidence scale
This study is like a test where they gave three groups of people the same exercise program, but one group got a special drink with chia, one with whey protein, and one with just juice. They measured muscle and strength before and after. They found that all groups got stronger and gained muscle, but the drinks didn't make a difference. So this study shows that for these people, the extra protein drinks didn't help more than the exercise alone.
The study has a COI section but no disclosure was found. A small penalty has been applied.
Strengths
- Randomized controlled design
- Single-blinded (participants blinded)
- Supervised resistance training
Weaknesses
- Small sample size (6 per group)
- Single-blinded (assessors not blinded)
- Short duration (8 weeks)
Methodology
Evidence Keywords
Statistical Reporting
Scoring
How strong is this study?
The study was done carefully - they randomly assigned people to groups, and the people didn't know which drink they got. But there were only 18 people total, which is a small number, so we can't be very sure that the results would be the same for everyone. Also, they only studied young men who already eat a lot of protein, so we can't say the same for other people.
40 / 100
- COI disclosure+40/40
- Data availabilitydata not shared
- Code availabilitycode not shared
70 / 100
- Randomization+20/20
- Blinding+9/15
- Control group+15/15
- Sample size (n=18)+1.7/20
- Follow-up+10/10
100 / 100
46 / 100
- P-values+15/15
- Effect sizeno effect size reported
- Confidence intervals+15/15
- Pre-registrationnot pre-registered
Each component is scored out of 100 and then capped by the study design — a case series cannot reach the ceiling a randomised trial can, however well it is reported.
Where it sits
RCT reviewsReviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)
Max 100Randomized TrialsRandomized Trials
Max 90Reviews of Cohort StudiesReviews of Cohort Studies
Max 85Cohort StudiesCohort Studies
Max 72Reviews of Case-Control StudiesReviews of Case-Control Studies
Max 63Case-Control StudiesCase-Control Studies
Max 58Cross-Sectional & Case SeriesCross-Sectional & Case Series
Max 50Expert OpinionExpert Opinion
Max 564 / 100
Probability of being correct
Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.
This design can establish causation. As an RCT, this study can establish causal relationships, but the null result is limited by the small sample size (n=18) and the specific population (healthy untrained young men with high habitual protein intake). The absence of a significant effect does not prove that no effect exists in other populations or under different conditions.
No Conflicts
No conflicts of interest identified
No conflicts of interest were declared in the provided text. The study appears to be independently conducted.
The study uses commercial products (Benexia chia powder, Syntrax whey protein, Daily juice) but no funding or COI is disclosed. The full paper may contain a COI statement not included in the provided excerpt.
Standing
Who’s using this study?
The videos and claims on this site that lean on this study, and the researchers who wrote it.
1 video from Siim Land cite this study, drawing 1 claim from it.