View

The Study

The Real-Life Use of a Protein-Sparing Modified Fast Diet by Nasogastric Tube (ProMoFasT) in Adults with Obesity: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial

In simple terms

This study compared two ways of giving a special diet to people with obesity: one through a tube in the nose and one by mouth. It found that the tube version helped people keep more muscle and lower insulin levels. But it didn't prove the tube version is better for losing weight overall — just that it changed some body parts and blood numbers differently.

61%

Analysis score

61/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology61
Publication100
Statistical46
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

When very overweight people eat a strict low-calorie, high-protein diet, giving it through a tube into the stomach helps them keep more muscle and lose more fat than eating the same food by mouth — even if they lose the same total weight.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
61

61 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — keeping more muscle and lowering insulin improves metabolism and long-term health, even if weight loss is the same.
  2. 2Higher HbA1c is unexpected and needs more study.
  3. 3Tube group: 63.1% fat-free mass vs.
  4. 452.9% oral; 45.0% muscle mass vs.
  5. 536.1% oral; 36.9 kg fat mass vs.
  6. 644.0 kg oral; insulin 11.8 vs.
  7. 728.0 mU/L.
  8. 8HbA1c was higher in tube group (6.2% vs.
  9. 95.4%).

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Nutrients

Year

2023

Authors

E. Formisano, I. Schiavetti, R. Gradaschi, Paolo Gardella, Carlotta Romeo, Livia Pisciotta, S. G. Sukkar

Open Access
2 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.